<h2>Through t
he concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>
Explanation:
In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.
Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.
This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.
Answer:
European allies believed that after the recover of world war II their colonies would finally provide the combination of raw materials and protected markets for finished goods that would cement the colonies to Europe
Answer: 1,2,4
to punish the South for the war
to help the formerly enslaved achieve freedom and equality
to impose requirements for Southern states to rejoin the Union
Explanation:
