Answer: Read my explainantion;)
Explanation:
The key thing to remember is that biochemistry is the chemistry of the living world. Plants, animals, and single-celled organisms all use the same basic chemical compounds to live their lives. Biochemistry is not about the cells or the organisms. It's about the smallest parts of those organisms, the molecules.
The "<span>complete predicate" in this form would actually be "Family". When considering the predicate, we are looking for the person that would be taking this kind of action. And in this case, it would be the family.
</span><span>The family enjoyed a tasty fish supper.</span>
I don't think we can answer this question just like that. The question should be formulated a bit differently:
WHAT is in danger from the effects of overfishing?
Well, in the end of the "effect-spectrum" we are in danger, since we also eat fish. But the most affected species are the ones that form the aquatic ecosystems. Such as fish. Examples:
1 - Many of the fish we eat, feed on sea-weed. If there aren't enough fish to eat the growing population of sea-weed, many fish die of intoxication.
2 - We don't have almost any fish restrictions in a way, because we can eat basically all of them. Therefore, many fish (which are also being eaten) find themselves in a lack of food.
3 - Many times, we concentrate on a specific species, which is a main cause of the extinction of species.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
I don’t know but it’s either b or c
The obligate aerobes need oxygen for their survival, while the obligate anaerobes do not. The obligate aerobes are the species that attain the energy for the process of aerobic respiration with the help of oxygen as the ultimate electron acceptor for the electron transport chain.
On the other hand, obligate anaerobes are the species, which get poisoned by the usual levels of atmospheric oxygen, and thus, get killed in the existence of oxygen.
