<span>d. achievement-oriented
The Path-Goal Theory states that Dr. Weiss would respond best and benefit most from an achievement-oriented leadership style. An achievement-oriented leader sets high goals for their employees and expects them to perform at their best. The employees are not told the specific ways to meet these high goals, being expected instead to use their own abilities to figure out how. An achievement-oriented leadership style is known to work for sales and especially scientific fields, such as the one that Dr. Weiss works in.</span>
Answer:
Yield to maturity is 1.51%
Explanation:
Zero Coupon rate does not offer any coupon payment and it is issued at deep discount value.
Face value = F = $100
Price = P = $98.50
Year to mature = n = 1 year
Yield to maturity = ( F - P ) / n ] / [ (F + P ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = ( $100 - $98.5 ) / 1 ] / [ ( $100 + $98.5 ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = $1.5 / 99.25
Yield to maturity = 0.0151
Yield to maturity = 1.51%
Tech A says that packing a wheel bearing assembly can be done by hand with proper results. Tech B says that packing a wheel bearing assembly with a bearing packer will get the proper results. The two statements are right. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a wheel bearing?</h3>
Generally, the wheel bearing is simply defined as an important component of a vehicle's braking, steering, and suspension systems.
In conclusion, The one-piece hub assembly is located between the drive axle and the brake disc.
Read more about wheel bearing
brainly.com/question/16013734
#SPJ1
Answer:
PED = -1.4 or |1.4| in absolute values, price elastic
Explanation:
the price elasticity of demand (PED) using the midpoint method:
PED = % change in quantity / % change in price
- % change in quantity = {(Q
2 − Q1
) / [(Q2 + Q1)/2]} x 100 = {(200 − 300
) / [(200 + 300)/2]} x 100 = -100 / 250 = -0.4
- % change in price = {(P2 − P1
) / [(P2 + P1)/2]} x 100 = {(1 − 0.75
) / [(1 + 0.75)/2]} x 100 = 0.286
PED = -0.4 / 0.286 = -1.4 or |1.4| in absolute values
Answer:
An unrealized holding gain of $28 million in 2019.
Explanation:
At the financial year-end, the company have to reevaluate the investment to recognize the gain or loss.
If the fair value is higher than actual investment, the company gain and vice versa it lost.
In this scenario, the fair value adjustment = the valuation on 31st December – purchased value = $150 million - $132 million = $28 million.
Because this step is just an approach to record new valuation of investment, then it’s consider unrealized.
In short, Phillips Corporation should first update the fair value adjustment of $28 million on December 31 2021
