That's a lot of questions! You need not give me the "brainliest," as I may only respond to a couple of those points for the sake of time here.
#2 in your list: In Lincoln's first inaugural address, he said: "Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy." In other words, if states could choose to secede from the union, then there was really no union and no government. (Anarchy is the absence of government.) Only if we abide by the constitutional checks we place on ourselves in a democratic republic are we exercising genuine government. Otherwise, we fall into chaos or some sort of dictatorial state. Lincoln felt that the whole concept of self-government was at stake, threatened by the South's desire to secede. Lincoln had to treat the secession of several states as an act of rebellion.
#5 in your list (closely related to #2): The states that had seceded already had caused the civil war, in Lincoln's estimation. The northern states had to respond to hold the union together. The southern states claimed to be afraid for their property, peace and safety with an administration like Lincoln's in charge. But Lincoln saw those fears as unfounded, that all states would continue to enjoy their constitutional privileges. But seceding from the union cut them off from all stability and security.
The correct answer is Fort Duquesne. At first the French controlled it and the British attacked to take it from them. The french withdrew and destroyed the fort when they realized the British were going to win and this became a major victory for the British army.
When humans first started to appear they had yet to figure out how to farm or fish. However they knew how to hunt animals using spears and such. They also were gatherers because they gathered berries. Later in the human race farming and fishing came into play. So I say A. Hunters......Gatherers.
Answer:
idek
Explanation:
he is dead now he got sniped
Thomas Jefferson include in the Declaration of Independence to make clear the colonists' right to rebel against the British government was the fact that he stated in what way the rigths of the colonists were violated by westminsetr and the kng