Answer:
Option B, Jamal is entitled to revoke acceptance because he took back the motorcycle after the seller's assurance that the nonconformity would be cured.
Explanation:
The primary purpose of purchasing goods is to obtain conforming goods of the desired quality. Occasionally, the seller delivers non-conforming goods, goods that fail to meet the contractual obligation (obligations include: seller's description, statements promises...). In situations like this the buyer may revoke his acceptance if already accepted or reject the delivery upon discovery.
If delivery is already accepted, acceptance may be revoked;
* On the reasonable grounds that its non-conformity would be cured and it has not be cured.
* Without discovery of such non-conformity if his acceptance was reasonably induced either by the difficulty of delivery before acceptance or by the seller's assurances.
Therefore, option B best suits the question. Under these circumstances, Jamal is entitled to revoke his acceptance because the he took back the motorcycle after the seller's assurance that the non-conformity would be cured which was not, even after several complaints.
Answer:
The multiplier is useful in determining the change in GDP resulting from a change in spending
Explanation:
A change in autonomous spending will lead to a much larger final change in real GDP because of the multiplier effect. That spending will have a much larger final impact on real GDP.
Answer:
Account Title Dr Cr
Supplies Expense (22,150+9,350-8,810)..............22690
Supplies....................................................................................22690
Interest Receivable .....................................................450
Interest Revenue .......................................................................450
Rent Revenue.............................................................$7,000
Unearned Revenue...............................................................$7,000
Answer:
A. the risk of wind damage is potentially diversifiable, but the risk of flooding is not
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the best explanation for these different approaches would be that the risk of wind damage is potentially diversifiable, but the risk of flooding is not. Meaning that most insurance companies cover wind damage because it is most likely during a hurricane but flooding may be a unique situation which is not always covered by most insurance companies/policies.
Answer:
cultural variables
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the company is taking into account cultural variables. This refers to the different behaviors, outlooks, values and beliefs between people from different societies that make them unique. In this case selling different foods in different locations in order to compensate for the differences in beliefs is taking into account the cultural variables.
