Answer: A and C
Explanation: This is because there is no evidence for the other two answers.
Three pieces of evidence support this belief, these are the lines "they thought of how they had laboured," "what discouragements they had overcome" and "they gambolled round and round the windmill, uttering cries of triumph."
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Animals are being exploited and living in bad conditions, even after the revolution that promised them so much.
- This was all aggravated after the windmill stopped working, as it was essential for the farm's well-being.
- All of this made them feel very despondent about the whole situation.
- When the windmill was recovered, they felt very happy and ignored all the problems they were going through.
- They skipped around the mill, as its working was a point of happiness amidst the difficulties they were going through.
With that, even though there were still many problems on the farm, they felt excited, mainly because the mill was fixed by their work.
This question is about "Animal Farm" and you can find more information about it here:
brainly.com/question/11909124
Answer:
1) The subject domain
2) The document domain
3) The media domain
Explanation:
These are the 3 domains of content structure/writing.
He wanted to convey that indifference is worse than hate or anger. One could be angry at injustice or hate evil, violent acts Indifference is the absence of compassion and implies something worse than outright hate; indifference implies a lack of acknowledgment. Being indifferent to another's suffering is like saying, 'you're suffering is not even worth my consideration.' Wiesel speaks from his experience of the Holocaust, but this could be applied to any situation in history in which the world was indifferent; in which the world willfully refused to acknowledge suffering of others for any number of unjustifiable reasons: 1) out of sight, out of mind, 2) passivity, laziness, 3) an untried feeling of hopelessness ('what could i possibly do?'), 4) selfishness. When Wiesel speaks of indifference he also means ignorance in 3 senses: 1) ignorant as in lacking sensitivity, 2) lacking knowledge and 3) ignoring. The 'perils of indifference' could be described as the 'the terrible outcomes of ignoring atrocities. Apply this to anything today, where suffering is ignored by indifferent people and governments. (i.e., Darfur, Haiti). The peril of indifference would be to allow (allow by ignoring = indifference) an atrocity like the Holocaust to occur again.
