All categories

3 years ago

HELP QUICKKKKK Samuel de Champlain established the colony of Quebec. Where was

Social Studies

1 answer:

Bad White [126]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The correct answer is C: France.

Explanation:

Samuel de Champlain (1567-1635) was a French navigator, colonist, known as the founder of the city of Quebec and consolidator of the French colonies in the New World.

In 1608 he founded the French settlement, which became the city of Quebec.

In 1609 he led an expedition along the Richelieu River and explored a lake in today's Vermont and New York. He named the lake after himself, after being the first European who described it and put it on maps.

Champlain was the first European who explored and described the Great Lakes and published maps of his travels with his notes on what he learned from the natives and the French who lived with the natives.

In 1620, King Louis XIII ordered him to return to Quebec and to govern the new land. He was de facto governor of New France since he could not obtain the title officially, because of his humble origin.

You might be interested in

Which of the following statements about the relationship between the risks and returns of investments are correct? Select all th

sammy [17]

The correct answer would be option B and C.

Generally, the higher the potential return that an investment offers, the higher the risk associated with the investment.

Generally, the lower the potential return that an investment offers, the lower the risk associated with the investment.

Explanation:

There is a direct relationship between Risk and Returns. This phrase is quite commonly used by the accounting and finance related people, that 'High Risk, High Return, Low Risk, Low Return'.

It is quite true. We can take an example of high risk investments like stocks. If a person invests heavily in foreign exchange market in stocks, the risk of investment is too high, but at the same time, the person is able to get high returns on his investments in a short period of time.

Similarly, is a person invests in a bonds, there is low or no risk associated with this type of investment. So the return is also low for such investments.

So if a person is a risk taker, he can enjoy considerable returns as well, and vice versa.

Learn more about risk and return relationship at:

brainly.com/question/814982

#LearnWithBrainly

5 0

3 years ago

..... is the best example of a dictor

Neporo4naja [7]

Answer:

kim Jong dumb

Explanation:

hehe yep this is true

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An automobile could be positioned to satisfy customer needs at which three levels of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs:

Vinil7 [7]

The correct answer would be, Safety, social (belongingness and love), and self-esteem.

An automobile could be positioned to satisfy customer needs at Safety, social (belongingness and love), and self-esteem levels of Maslow's Hierarchy of needs.

Explanation:

According to Maslow's Hierarchy of needs, there are five main levels. These are :

Physiological
Safety
Social
Self Esteem
Self Actualization

Automobile could be positioned in the Safety, Social and Self Esteem levels of Maslow's Hierarchy, because using one own's automobile would be safe for the person, it would be safe for his belongings and loved ones as well, It also gives him a sense of self esteem by thinking that he owns an automobile, which means he has achieved something in his life.

Learn more about Maslow's Hierarchy at:

brainly.com/question/1785981

#LearnWithBrainly

7 0

3 years ago

How is Africa culture similar to European culture

pentagon [3]

European imperialism was motivated by a desire for economic both regions.

8 0

3 years ago

Why were the Anti-federalists opposed to the Federal government controlling the Militia?

bija089 [108]

Answer:

They believed that if the federal government had control of the army and the militia it would be very dangerous, because the government would have a strong centralization of power.

Explanation:

For anti-federalists, allowing the government to have centralized control of the militia would give a lot of power to the head of federal control, that is, it would give a lot of power to the president. This could promote a strong abuse of power, as the country's armed forces would be controlled by a single person, who would be too powerful to be prevented from acting as he wished.

3 0

3 years ago