Answer:
It was a waste of money.
Explanation:
The feelings of the New York
Herald Tribune toward the Alaska Purchase in 1867 was that it was a total waste of money for the Country to make such purchase due to the extreme weather conditions in this area. The area was also known to be a very remote setting with few people and inhabitants willing to settle down there at that point in time. Other conditions include other pressing issues such as unemployment and the economy.
These are the reason why it was said to be a waste of money.
The United States Constitution makes no mention of municipal (or local) governments. Instead, the Tenth Amendment delegated authority to the states. It is hardly surprising, then, that state-local relations vary greatly between states as well as within them.
Hence, it may be said that the United States does not meet the "Happy Balance" allowing for local autonomy and state authority while abiding by national standards.
<h3>Which arm of the US Government is the Most Powerful?</h3>
The US Presidency has emerged as the strongest and most powerful of the three parts of government.
Among the specified powers are the authority to:
- collect taxes
- regulate trade
- establish a uniform rule of naturalization
- create federal courts (subordinate to the Supreme Court)
- organize and maintain a military, and
- declare war.
Learn more about arms of the US Government:
brainly.com/question/9261004
#SPJ1
Federalism and the 10th amendment work together--the 10th Amendment states that if something is not covered by the Constitution and there is no specific federal power, then the power goes to the state.
Federalism is the principle that government should be divided between a central power and regional powers. In the case of the 10th Amendment, if the central power doesn't have explicit power to do something then the states have the power to do so.
<span>Historiography is the
study of methodology and history. Historiography may refer to a specific study
like techniques, writings and more.
Historiography strongly suggest about history that it keeps on changing depends
on who studied it and what kind of study did the historian do. Histories are
not always perceived as the same, there will be always different thoughts of
how the events happened and how it was resolved. Through the years, history evident
also change because no one really knows the real story.</span>
