Answer:
The correct answer is b. It implies that prices reflect all available information.
Explanation:
The efficient market hypothesis is a theory initially enunciated by Eugene Fama (1970). It states that the current price of an asset in the market reflects all available information that exists (historical, public and private).
This theory considers that any news or future event that may affect the price of an asset will make the price adjust so quickly that it is impossible to obtain an economic benefit from it. Given this, it is considered a waste of time and money to try to analyze the values, since there will be no undervalued or overvalued assets in the market.
The answer to your question should be Retain customers.
Answer:
publicity
Explanation:
Publicity involves creating an excellent reputation for a company's brand name. Publicly arises from positives messages from the media, and other sources such as the internet and word of mouth. An organization engages in activities that create a good relationship with the media and the public to build the desired publicity.
Publicity messages are not paid for, unlike advertising. In the case of Maddie, the business was engaged in a charitable event. The event was captured in the press, and Maddie brand name was mentioned, thus promoting its brand name.
Answer:
Apr 1
DR Cash $234,000
CR Common stock $63,000
CR Paid in capital in excess of par - Common Stock $171,000
<em>(To record issuance of common stock)</em>
Apr 7
DR Cash $540,000
CR Preferred stock $350,000
CR Paid in capital in excess of par - Preferred Stock $190,000
<em>(To record issuance of preferred stock)</em>
Explanation:
April 1
Cash
9,000 * 26 = $234,000
Common stock
9,000*7 = $63,000
April 7
Cash
5,000*108 = $540,000
Preferred stock
5,000*70 = $350,000
Answer:
The correct answer is D
Explanation:
Title VII of the 1964, Civil Rights Act, states the federal law and it prohibits the employers from discriminating the employees on the grounds of color, sex, religion, race and national origin.
So, in this case, Jay sues the corporation against this title, but the corporation learns that Jay lied on his job application and on this ground the corporation would fired him. This is done after acquiring the evidence and it is not a defense.
