Answer:
Identification of the Internal Control Weaknesses:
A. There is no segregation of duties and there is lack of access control. Jerry Miller as a security guard is not expected to have a master key to the cash box. With this he can pilfer the cash. If he prepares the report that shows the number of cars that parked on the lot, he is not supposed to also prepare the day's cash receipts. Otherwise, he can state any number of cars as parked that he likes, and which corresponds to the cash he might leave in the Cash box since he also has a master key.
B. There is no segregation of duties and there is lack of supervision, proper reconciliations, and assets audit. Sharon Fisher handles purchase transactions from the beginning to the close all alone with a third party. This exposes the company to procurement frauds and collusion with suppliers. She can purchase assets for the company at prices that would enrich her personally.
C. Forming an audit opinion on the basis of ratio analysis of last year's comparative financial statements exposes the company to audit risks. While ratio analysis is part of the basis for forming audit opinions, it is surely not the first audit procedure to obtain audit evidence to support his audit opinion on the financial statements. An auditor is expected to obtain sufficient audit evidence and perform audit substantive tests of financial statement assertions. He or she is also expected to review the internal control system to ensure that it is operating effectively after establishing its existence and reviewing changes in internal controls.
Explanation:
Internal Controls are controls established by management in order to help it achieve business goals. There are many internal controls, including Separation of Duties, Access Controls
, Authorization and Approvals, Asset Audits, Reconciliations, and Data Backups. The purposes of internal controls are to establish the reliability of financial reporting, ensure timely feedback on the achievement of operational or strategic goals, and achieve compliance with financial management laws, and accounting regulations.
Answer:
The Pareto principle
Explanation:
The Pareto principle asserts that 80 percent of output will come from 20 percent of inputs. In different words, 80 percent of the results will come from 20 percent of the action. The Pareto principle is only an observation, not a law. The principle is applicable in business and almost all other disciplines.
In applying the Pareto principle, a business recognizes its best assets as uses efficiently to gain maximum value. The principle observes that similar amounts of input will yield different outputs. For business, results will never be evenly distributed, hence the need to identify and appreciate the minority inputs that will produce the majority of results.
Answer:
$5,000
Explanation:
The computation of total amount of excess fair over book value amortization expense adjustments to be recognized by red is shown below:-
Excess of fair value over book value = Land fair value - Land book value
= $52,000 -$42,000
= -$10,000
Here land is not amortized
Excess of fair value over book value = Building fair value - Building book value
= $390,000 - $200,000
= $190,000
Excess fair value over book value amortization expense adjustments to be recognized by red = Excess of fair value over book value of building ÷ Number of Years
= $190,000 ÷ 10
= $19,000
Excess of fair value over book value = Equipment fair value - Equipment book value
= $280,000 - $350,000
= ($70,000)
Excess fair value over book value amortization expense adjustments to be recognized by red for equipment = Excess of fair value over book value of equipment ÷ Number of Years
= ($70,000) ÷ 5
= ($14,000)
Total amount of excess fair over book value amortization expense adjustments to be recognized by red
= $19,000 - $14,000
= $5,000
Answer:
Explanation:
Given:
Discount = original price × discount fraction
Discounted price = original price - discount
Discount fraction = 20%
= 20/100
A.
Original price of shirt = $x
Original price of hat = $(x + 10)
Discounted price of shirt = $x - $0.2x
= $0.8x
Discounted price of hat = $(x + 10)
- 0.2$(x + 10)
= $0.8 × (x + 10)
Difference of discounted price of hat to shirt = 0.8(x + 10) - 0.8x
= $8
B.
Original price of shirt = $x
Original price of hat = $ 1.5 × x
Discounted price of shirt = $x - $0.2x
= $0.8x
Discounted price of hat = $ 1.5 × x
- 0.2 × $ 1.5 × x
= $ 1.2x
Difference of discounted price of hat to shirt = 1.2x - 0.8x
= $ 0.4x
This doesn't seem to be a question, but rather, a statement.
