Answer:
sunk cost.
Explanation:
Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered. Thus, because a sunk cost has been incurred by an individual or organization it can't be recovered and as such it is irrelevant in the decision-making process such as investments, projects etc.
Basically, sunk costs are referred to as fixed costs.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, a cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a sunk cost.
For example, ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
Answer:
Store cards are credit cards that typically can only be used at specific stores. Retailers partner with banks to offer these revolving lines of credit to customers. Store cards encourage shoppers to purchase items on credit today and pay them off over time. The advantage for the store is that you’re locked into their ecosystem; the advantage for you is that you might receive offers that are exclusive to cardholders.
The main difference between a store card and a credit card is that where a store card can only be used at a specific store, a credit card can be used anywhere that credit cards are accepted.
Explanation:
I believe it s3 but not quite sure
The opportunity cost that Gomer would have was the benefit
that he could attain from studying for an hour than spend his time playing
basketball within an hour. If he prioritize first his studying, then he would
gain benefit from it than spending his time playing the basketball.