Answer:A pair of sandals.
Explanation:Its so obvious stating that the marginal utility derived from sandals is higher compared to the other two items. You maximize your utility by going for the item with highest satisfaction which is glaringly sandals.
You also maximize your utility by considering the item which is economica prudent to one needs or want.
<h3>In the given scenario unemployment rate is 10%
</h3>
Explanation:
In the given problem,
Number of People who are working is 90,000
Number of People who are not working but looking and available is 10,000
Unemployment rate = Percentage of the total labor force that is unemployed but actively looking for employment and ready to work.
Unemployment rate = ((Unemployed people * 100) / (Total people in an economy (Working + Available for work)))
Unemployment rate = ((10000 * 100) / (90000+10000))
Unemployment rate = (1000000 / 100000)
Hence, Unemployment rate = 10%
Answer:
Clarissa needs to fund the growing perpetuity by $166666.67
Explanation:
A perpetuity is an investment that will give a future series of infinite payments so if the perpetuity gives you a periodic growth rate then you find the difference between the interest rate and the growth rate then use the perpetuity formula which is:
Pv = C/(i-g)
where Pv is the present value of the perpetuity which will be the initial investment.
C is the periodic payments that will be received in future in this case $5000
i is the interest rate given for the perpetuity which is 8%
g is the growth rate per fixed period which is 5%
thereafter we substitute on the above mentioned formula:
Pv= $5000/(8%-5%) then compute
Pv = $166666.67 which will be the initial investment for Clarissa to be paid $5000 per year until she dies.
Answer:
to know what the other people are interested in, for example they do a survey to see how much of each product they need and the popularity of how many people like the stuff, those are 2 reasons, quantity and I would say popularity 3: get the people to know that enreprenuer cares 4 and five just think about it, I cant really think of anymore
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is b Justifies ignoring the matching principle in certain circumstances.
Explanation:
