According to the Espionage Act, it is illegal to intentionally disclose classified information without consent. Up to ten years in prison, a hefty fine, or even being accused of treason are possible penalties.
The disclosure of classified material is prohibited by a number of federal statutes. The law bans the knowing and intentional transmission of specific classified information to an unauthorized person under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 798. Only information about American communications intelligence systems and operations is covered in this section. Any of the following actions concerning sensitive information that are done knowingly and willingly are illegal:
- communication, provision, transmission, or availability in any other way to an unauthorized individual
- Release it
- Use it in a manner that is harmful to government interests or safety.
A conviction for unauthorized disclosure carries a sentence of up to 10 years in jail, a large fine, or both.
To know more about classified information, refer:
brainly.com/question/25031712
#SPJ4
Answer:
Juan
Explanation:
because he killed people just for trying to stop his sons from fighting. All sibilings fight it's a part of life
Answer:
B/C U CAN CRASH IF U DONT OR KILL SOMEONE
Explanation:
Answer:
"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."
Explanation:
