Answer:
Based on the distinction drawn between Hamsun and Ibsen, the inference that seems most reasonable is:
2. Ibsen is a writer concerned with how problems can be fixed or mitigated.
Explanation:
<u>The work of Norwegian writer Henrik Ibsen focused on social issues considered taboo during the 19th century, such as sexually-transmitted diseases and sexism.</u> It is not that Ibsen was fascinated with horror or tragedy. Rather, he was brave and bold enough to approach such themes and even present a controversial way of dealing with them. In the play "A Doll's House", for instance, Nora ends up leaving her abusive husband.
<u>Having that in mind and taking the passage into consideration, we can see that Ibsen is a writer concerned with how problems can be fixed or mitigated. While Hamsun seems to view social problems as tolerable and humorous, as something not worth fighting against, Ibsen sees them as central, important, and changeable.</u>
Answer:
What do you wish your parents would do? we can't answer this.
I do not have a baby, but maybe my friend Megan has one. I dont know
My answer is no, I don’t
-SammySilkWorm waz here
Answer:
What kept Malala going was school. However, schools were being blown up across Pakistan due to the aggressiveness of the Taliban.
Explanation:
In his book "I am Malala," Malala recounts the moment when the Taliban dominated Pakistan, implementing an oppressive and violent system that changed people's lives in a very negative way, especially women. Malala says that cases of violence, harassment and murder were constant after Taliban control. The Taliban also banned women from receiving formal education and blew up schools across the country. Malala felt very sad about this situation, but going to school gave her hope and allowed her to keep moving forward, as she knew that only an educated population could defeat the Taliban.
Answer:
1. Chaltu's name was changed by Bona
2. The novel was read by mom in one day.
3. The classroom was painted by Bikila
Explanation:
When writing a sentence in active form, the subject of the sentence acts on the verb while in the passive form, the subject receives the action.
Using the first example for instance, the subject is "Bona" and in active voice, it is written thus: "Bona changed Chaltu's name" with the subject "Bona" acting on the subject "Chaltu's name".
Meanwhile, in the passive form, the subject "Bona" is the receiver of the action, thus: "Chaltu's name was changed by Bona"
