All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following statements is true?

Mathematics

2 answers:

marshall27 [118]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If you try to divide 135 with each number,every number is divisible by 135 XD

Levart [38]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

the correct answer is b

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

2. The National Safety Council routinely analyzes the benefit of seat belt use on driver safety. Their data showed that among 28

JulijaS [17]

Answer:

We conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that among 2823 drivers not wearing seat belts, 31 died as a result of injuries, and among 7765 drivers wearing seat belts 16 were killed.

Let $p_1$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts.

$p_2$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1=p_2$ {means that there is no difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1\neq p_2$ {means that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts = $\frac{31}{2823}$ = 0.011

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts = $\frac{16}{7765}$ = 0.002

$n_1$ = sample of drivers not wearing seat belts = 2823

$n_2$ = sample of drivers wearing seat belts = 7765

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.011-0.002)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} } }$

= 4.438

The value of z test statistics is 4.438.

Now, at 5% significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistic doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Also, Margin of error (E) = $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} }$

= $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} }$

= 0.00397

5 0

3 years ago

How do you express equivalent equation

ExtremeBDS [4]

Http://www.icoachmath.com/math_dictionary/equivalent_equations.html

Here's a website that might help

8 0

3 years ago

Which is the equivalent expression in its most simplified form? 5(2x – 3) + 7

N76 [4]

5(2x-3)+7
distribute the 5 to the 2x and -3
10x-15+ 7
combine like terms -15+7
10x-8

3 0

3 years ago

Jane bought 5 apples at $120 each. She sells them to John to make a profit of 10%. What is the selling price of each apple?

Alex787 [66]

Answer:

she resells each apple for $132

Step-by-step explanation:

I multiplied 120 by 0.1 to find how much she would be marking up the price of each apple. I got the answer of $12. So then I added that $12 to $120 and got the new price of $132.

I checked my work I swear it's correct

hope this helps chu <3

5 0

3 years ago

If a person weighs 130 Ibs and they lose 1/10 of their weight.How much weight was lost

vampirchik [111]

Answer:

13 lbs

Step-by-step explanation:

to find 1/10 we divide by 10

This can be found by moving the decimal back by one

So 130/10=13

13 lbs were lost

8 0

3 years ago