1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ikadub [295]
3 years ago
15

Ronald Rawls and Zabian Bailey were in an auto accident in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Bailey rear-ended Rawls at a stoplight. The

evidence showed that Bailey had failed to apply his brakes in time to avoid the collision, failed to turn his vehicle to avoid the collision, failed to keep his vehicle under control, and was inattentive to his surroundings. Because Bailey’s auto insurance did not cover all of the costs, Rawls filed a suit in a Connecticut state court against his own insurance company, Progressive Northern Insurance Co. Rawls wanted to obtain benefits under an underinsured motorist clause. Rawls claimed that Bailey had been negligent. Could Rawls collect from Progressive because of Bailey’s negligence?
Law
1 answer:
sveticcg [70]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I think he can not . I believe that it has nothing to do that if for example  Bailey had a car insurance with Progressive, which means it is  supposed to provide additional insurance  when they are injured by someone who does not have adequate insurance to cover the full  damages. Bailey was negligent In the car accident. Bailey had failed to apply his brakes in time to avoid the collision, failed to turn his vehicle to avoid the collision, failed to keep his vehicle under control, and was inattentive to his surroundings.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
A person who makes a private persons’ arrest must notify the arrested person of this right to protection against self in crimina
Nadya [2.5K]

Answer:

not sure exactly what you're asking but basically it's the right to remain silent because anything that is said can be used against you and you have the right to have an attorney

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What is capitalism and disadvantage s if capitalist economy​
Monica [59]

Answer:

Capitalism leads to inequalities in the income. In capitalism, firms can get monopoly over workers and consumers. A high profit earning motive of capitalist economy leads to using resources in such a way that it leads to environmental problems by destroying the natural balance.

8 0
2 years ago
How do you identify employees who have violent potential and how do you deal with them?
spin [16.1K]

Explanation:

<u><em>i will focus to them of what he do or they do that not know them that i keep watching they do everything.It because i didn't like that kind of ability liying to everyone can't work fairlly it's so unfair.</em></u>

6 0
2 years ago
Allows an appointed attorney-in-fact to make decisions about the grantor's medical care
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

(Might not be right) B. medical directive

Explanation:

An advance healthcare directive, also known as living will, personal directive, advance directive, medical directive or advance decision, is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following courts would not include a jury? Select all that apply.
zloy xaker [14]

Answer: Trial Jury

A trial jury, also known as a petit jury, decides whether the defendant committed the crime as charged in a criminal case, or whether the defendant injured the plaintiff in a civil case.

Consists of 6-12 people.

Trials are generally public, but jury deliberations are private.

Defendants have the right to appear, testify, and call witnesses on their behalf.

Final outcome is a verdict, in favor of plaintiff or defendant in a civil case, or guilty/not guilty in a criminal case.

Grand Jury

A grand jury is presented with evidence from the U.S. attorney, the prosecutor in federal criminal cases. The grand jury determines whether there is “probable cause” to believe the individual has committed a crime and should be put on trial. If the grand jury determines there is enough evidence, an indictment will be issued against the defendant.

Consists of 16-23 people.

Grand jury proceedings are not open to the public.

Defendants and their attorneys do not have the right to appear before the grand jury.

Explanation: bench trial is a trial by judge, as opposed to a trial by jury. The term applies most appropriately to any administrative hearing in relation to a summary offense to distinguish the type of trial. Many legal systems (Roman, Islamic) use bench trials for most or all cases or for certain types of cases.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Handout 1B: My Day in Court, But Which One?
    9·1 answer
  • Hamburger in stomach contents.
    5·1 answer
  • What do you think is the best way to choose a nation's leader? why?
    10·2 answers
  • Help! Will mark brainliest
    10·1 answer
  • GUY PLZ PLZ HELP MY I JUST NEED HELP
    8·1 answer
  • Why won’t anyone answer my questions
    10·2 answers
  • Police are allowed to use a ______ ______<br> of force than the suspect?
    9·1 answer
  • Which branch of government is responsible for enforcing laws?
    8·1 answer
  • You may not cross over solid double yellow lines unless __________.
    6·2 answers
  • What is equality of Nations, Nationalities and Peoples?​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!