Do you think defendants in George Floyd case should be tried together or separately and why

1 answer:

8 0

I strongly believe the defendents of George Floyd's case should be tried seperatrely. It would be extremely unwise to have them tried them together. If merely two white men together have the ability to murder someone and (<em>almost</em>) get away with it, then together in court they could do far worse. White supremecy is unjust and segregated. In court, every detail matters, as it will affect the defendent's outcome. By allowing white supremecy to get the upper hand by doubling it (this by having two defendents), the facts will be shifted and altered tremendously to support the side of the defendent, and the defendents' outcome will be unjustified.

Hope this helps!

I love writing stuff like this, it feels good. Plus, this took me like 5 minutes :P

You might be interested in

The critical concept that emerged in the palko decision is that of ________ rights.

Lelu [443]

Answer:

Double Jeopardy right

Explanation:

This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death

8 0

3 years ago

The four types of market structures we study in economics are perfect competition, monopoly, oligopoly, and monopsony.

V125BC [204]

Answer:

The overview according to the definition of the query is listed in the following part of the clarification.

Explanation:

Perfect rivalry or competition defines a business system in which a vast handful of similar competitors compete with homogeneous goods against each other.
Monopolistic, respectively, refers to a business system where a vast number of individual companies compete with distinct goods against one another and.
An Oligopoly defines a system of the economy where a limited number of businesses are competing against one another and.
A monopoly depends on the business system where every other market is dominated by a single company.

6 0

4 years ago

What are the arguments for limiting voting boxes?

solong [7]

Saqi Kahn loves to sleep with children of my age

7 0

3 years ago

Katrina had her license suspended for making false promises to clients. She had a habit of telling clients what they wanted to h

likoan [24]

There different types of rules. The guidelines that constitute most suspensions is Sections 10176 and 10177 of the Business and Professions Code.

<h3>The Real Estate Law </h3>

There are lots of law that has been set in business especially in the area of real estate. They are known to be legal requirements that one have to put in place so as to have a license and must observe them or face the the consequences such as suspension or revocation of licenses.

Sections 10176 and 10177 of this law is known to be the basis or framework for violations that stands for unlawful conduct and can result in license suspensions of revocations.

Learn more about guidelines from

brainly.com/question/17711902

4 0

2 years ago

What is your personal viewpoint regarding Hawaii's strict law? Take into account both arguments for and against. How do you deci

Alchen [17]

Answer:

Reason #7 you should not move to Hawaii: Fewer choices, less competition, poorer service, higher prices. Because of Hawaii's disincentives, there is less competition for anything in our small, closed market. Less competition is almost always bad for consumers and here it applies to much more than just high prices.Jul 16, 2019

Explanation:

6 0

4 years ago