1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna35 [415]
3 years ago
13

Do you think defendants in George Floyd case should be tried together or separately and why

Law
1 answer:
Anna11 [10]3 years ago
8 0

I strongly believe the defendents of George Floyd's case should be tried seperatrely. It would be extremely unwise to have them tried them together. If merely two white men together have the ability to murder someone and (<em>almost</em>) get away with it, then together in court they could do far worse. White supremecy is unjust and segregated. In court, every detail matters, as it will affect the defendent's outcome. By allowing white supremecy to get the upper hand by doubling it (this by having two defendents), the facts will be shifted and altered tremendously to support the side of the defendent, and the defendents' outcome will be unjustified.

Hope this helps!

I love writing stuff like this, it feels good. Plus, this took me like 5 minutes :P

You might be interested in
A police officer response to call about a young person with a gun sitting on a park bench upon arriving at the park in this craz
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

When an Officer is called to an incidence such as this, They have to take all precautions when guns or weapons are involved. In this case they could not get close enough because of precautions. When he did not put up his hands they were shown an act of defiance. At age 12 a boy knows how to follow commands especially from a cop. When he did not listen assuming he moved around not putting up his hands the cop(s) shot at the boy.

8 0
3 years ago
What type of marriage is generally not recognized until there is a dispute over property or upon the death of one of the parties
Debora [2.8K]

Explanation:

1) (B) "common law marriage" is generally not recognized until there is a dispute over property or upon the death of one of the parties. Because this type of marriages don't have any license that has been issued by government. It has happened without any formal ceremony, so that it could have been witnessed by parties.

2) (a) "copyright" is a type of intellectual property protection covers original works for an authors life plus 70 years. The inventions begins with the trade secret, before that there is need for securing it from getting it pirated.

3) (c) Sale proceeds from a Chapter 7 bankruptcy are split among"creditors" In case of the bankruptcy the assets of the debtors are paid among the pay holders or we may say the creditors.

4) (b) Bankruptcy proceedings protect the rights of creditors to "exempt assets in possession of the debtor"

5) (c) An independent adoption occurs when "the biological parents choose the adoptive parents" If in case the biological parents, gets connected to the adoptive parents without the help of the adoption agency, the independent adoption can take place.

4 0
3 years ago
One would be forgiven to think the murderers were in a silent competition to see who was most cruel or had the highest level of
pentagon [3]

Answer:

translate into polish pls

Explanation:

i dont understand

8 0
3 years ago
The code of hammurabi was a collection of what laws.
Soloha48 [4]

Answer:

282 rules

The Hammurabi code of laws, a collection of 282 rules, established standards for commercial interactions and set fines and punishments to meet the requirements of justice. Hammurabi's Code was carved onto a massive, finger-shaped black stone stele (pillar) that was looted by invaders and finally rediscovered in 1901

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why did President Truman go before a joint session of Congress after the British announced in 1947 that they could no longer aff
anygoal [31]

Answer:

In February 1947, the British government informed the United States that it could no longer furnish the economic and military assistance it had been providing to Greece and Turkey since the end of World War II. The Truman administration believed that both nations were threatened by communism and it jumped at the chance to take a tough stance against the Soviet Union. In Greece, leftist forces had been battling the Greek royal government since the end of World War II. In Turkey, the Soviets were demanding some manner of control over the Dardanelles, territory from which Turkey was able to dominate the strategic waterway from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean.

Explanation:

In February 1947, the British government informed the United States that it could no longer furnish the economic and military assistance it had been providing to Greece and Turkey since the end of World War II. The Truman administration believed that both nations were threatened by communism and it jumped at the chance to take a tough stance against the Soviet Union. In Greece, leftist forces had been battling the Greek royal government since the end of World War II. In Turkey, the Soviets were demanding some manner of control over the Dardanelles, territory from which Turkey was able to dominate the strategic waterway from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the 8 most significant events in SkillsUSA history? (Will give brainliest!)
    6·1 answer
  • which theory helps explain why a young male with tattoos and body piercings,who is stopped often by a police because of his appe
    6·1 answer
  • A bill is read three times in each House. true or false
    6·1 answer
  • This is a policy of nonparticipation in international affairs.
    10·2 answers
  • What do you understand by threats to fundamental principles of ethical behaviour?​
    12·1 answer
  • In the situation when traveling at high speed, approaching the slow moving vehicle too fast, there is a guardrail to your right,
    10·1 answer
  • What dose the fox say???
    7·1 answer
  • In which area does a city and country have authority, but not a town
    12·1 answer
  • The Connecticut Compromise brought together ideas presented in the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan. The result was
    12·1 answer
  • The First Amendment protects citizens' right to:
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!