Do you think defendants in George Floyd case should be tried together or separately and why

1 answer:

8 0

I strongly believe the defendents of George Floyd's case should be tried seperatrely. It would be extremely unwise to have them tried them together. If merely two white men together have the ability to murder someone and (<em>almost</em>) get away with it, then together in court they could do far worse. White supremecy is unjust and segregated. In court, every detail matters, as it will affect the defendent's outcome. By allowing white supremecy to get the upper hand by doubling it (this by having two defendents), the facts will be shifted and altered tremendously to support the side of the defendent, and the defendents' outcome will be unjustified.

Hope this helps!

I love writing stuff like this, it feels good. Plus, this took me like 5 minutes :P

You might be interested in

Why should political parties have intra party elections

iVinArrow [24]

Answer:

To pick the best canidate/ representative to be the face of the political party

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What are the exponents of [a], [b], and [c] (in that order) in the rate law?.

dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:

k = rate constant

A & B = reactants

x & y = reactant orders

Given reaction: aA + bB + C → dD + eE

Rate Law: Rate = k[A]q[B]r[C]s

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Which of these is not, according to your text, a

melomori [17]

Answer: B

Explanation: Inspecting the car is not typically apart of determining whether or not someone is under the influence unless they have unreasonable doubt that the driver is under the influence of something and they need to find out what incase it isn't alcohol

4 0

3 years ago

Customer service is important for every profession. If you were working in an organization, how would you maintain good relation

BabaBlast [244]

Ask for suggestions, be kind, be sympathetic to better understand the issue

5 0

3 years ago

What programs are in place to help with rehabilitation, retribution, incapacitation, and deterrence?

Romashka [77]

Answer:

Specific deterrence prevents crime by frightening an individual defendant with punishment. ... Incapacitation prevents crime by removing a defendant from society. Rehabilitation prevents crime by altering a defendant's behavior. Retribution prevents crime by giving victims or society a feeling of avengement.

Explanation:

mark brainliest plss plss plss╥﹏╥╥﹏╥╥﹏╥╥﹏╥

8 0

3 years ago