The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Many European nations offer government services that are not offered in the United States. In order to do this, they require their citizens to pay higher taxes. The United States doesn't follow the same system because in Europe the governments invest in offering affordable services to the citizens, trying to consider the necessities of the poor. There are social programs aimed to facilitate health services and other services so much needed for the medium and low class.
In the United States, many services are seen as a business, Private companies offer the services but as a business to make a profit, not thinking about the necessities of less favored or poor. Depending on the political party in power, sometimes there are social programs to help the people, as in the case of the Democratic administration that raises more taxes to fund these programs. On the other hand, when the Republicans run the government, they do not like to raise more taxes to fund social programs. They think that people have to pay for the services they need.
Answer:
none of the above
Explanation:
once you start the car the doors should automatically lock they only unlock once the car isnt moving or if in the event that the airbag is deployed
Answer:
The fourteenth amendment establishes birthright citizenship. Thismeans that any person born in the U.S. is considered a U.S. citizen and has the right of life,liberty and property.
Explanation:
Answer:
There is
Explanation:
Self confidence is the believe in oneself that the person can do what he/she believes they cannot do
Self esteem is the motivation of oneself to do something
Self esteem leads to Self confidence in the sense that if you do not motivate yourself you will not believe in yourself.
Answer:
The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.
The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.
It states, for instance, that
<em>"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
</em>
- <em>
protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety
</em>
- <em>prevent disorder or crime
</em>
- <em>protect health or morals
</em>
- <em>protect the rights and reputations of other people
</em>
- <em>prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence
</em>
- <em>maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"</em>
Cheers!
