Conspicous Consumption was the term used by thorstein veblen to describe fundamental change in people's orientation to the economy.
Who was Thorstein Veblen?
Thorstein Veblen was a famous sociologist and economist who wrote the book The Theory of the Leisure Class. He wrote about the relationship between the economy, culture, and society.
Conspicuous consumption is the act of acquiring things or services specifically with the intention of flaunting one's affluence. When publicly displayed products and services are too expensive for other people in a person's class, conspicuous consumption is a way to demonstrate one's social position. Although it is frequently associated with the wealthy, this type of consumerism can occur in any income class.
The complete question is :
What term did Thorstein Veblen use to describe the fundamental change in people's orientation to the economy from producing goods to using them?
To learn more about Conspicous Consumption visit the link:
brainly.com/question/14546547?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
2 Days
Explanation:
First, there is the need to rewrite the utility function for clarity
U=V^{1/2}
1. The Probability of Falling ill by someone in the family is given as 20%
2. If someone should fall ill, the total number of days that would be spoiled is calculated as:
Total number of vacation= 10 days x Probability to fall ill = 20%
= 10 x 0.2 = 2 days
This means if someone should fall ill based on the probability, then 2 out of the total 10 days can be ruined
3. The number of days for vacation days to enjoy is 10-2 = 8 days
This means if the family gives up 2 days of probable illness, they can still enjoy their vacation.
V= 2 days
Answer:
$200 (million)
Explanation:
If the government spending increases by $200 million, then associated change in equilibrium income will be $ 200 million, assuming that Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is 1
Answer:
long run, productive resources
Answer:
a) Distinguish between the use of Franchising and Joint Venture as modes of entry into other countries by global businesses.
Franchising consists in the licensing of aspects of production and intellectual property to a another party: the franchise.
A Joint Venture is a business union between two or more parties, in which they split profit as well as costs and responsabilities.
b) What are the respective advantages and disadvantages of both strategies?
Franchising can be a quicker way to expand into foreign markets. The flexibility of the method, and the lower capital requirements are the reason why. This can be seen in the success that American fast-food brands have had using this method to expand in global markets.
A Joint-Venture can be more difficult to use for market expansion, however, it can be more profitable, because the profit will not be split among as many parties as in franchising, and more importantly, the firm maintains a higher control of the operation.
