1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleonysh [2.5K]
3 years ago
14

Compared with Medieval art, the purpose of Renaissance art was to

History
2 answers:
andrew11 [14]3 years ago
8 0

The right answer is “show the wealth of patrons”. In the Renaissance, a patron was a wealthy person who sponsored an artist for their work. For example, the Medici Family was one of those, they were a famous family from Florence who ruled and supported of the arts. Lorenzo the Magnificent, a famous member of it, is well-known for sponsoring Italian artists such as Michelangelo and Botticelli.

alisha [4.7K]3 years ago
5 0

<em><u>Compared with Medieval art, the purpose of Renaissance art was to show the wealth of patrons. </u></em>

<em><u></u></em>

Further Explanations:

Renaissance in European History spanned amid the 14th century and 17th century with the advancement of European middle age to modernity. The conceptual source of the theory was its genre of Humanism attained from Roman concepts of Humanities and classical Greek philosophical Protagoras stating that “man is the ration of all things” which became ostensible in science, literate, politics and art, and architecture.

The medieval art conveys the lifestyle of the patrons of that era who initially were the wealthy persons sponsoring artist for work. As we can see those Medici families were among those who were famous sponsoring those arts. Cosimo de' Medici also known as “Father of Fatherland” was an Italian bank officer and a politician and the first from the family of Medici to rule Florence during the Italian Renaissance. He established his authority from wealth, which he used to sway voters of the municipal councilors and officials. His authority was like a danger to the anti-Medici party administered by leaders like ReinaldoDegiAlbizzi.  

Learn more

  1. Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. the government has unlimited power to limit speech. the government must follow the first amendment.? <u>brainly.com/question/1804110 </u>
  2. Why did President Reagan call for soviet leader Gorbachev to “tear down” the berlin wall? <u>brainly.com/question/1459888 </u>
  3. Which of these was one of the few successes of the United States government under the articles of confederation?<u>brainly.com/question/6639139 </u>

Answer Details

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: Renaissance  

Keywords:

Cosimo de' Medici, politician, Florence, Italian Renaissance, legislative council, autocrat,art, architecture, ReinaldoDegiAlbizzi,science, literate, politics and art, and architecture,Italian Renaissance

You might be interested in
Which provision was not part of the compromise of 1850
Zina [86]
This is what I found out

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is external criticism so important when it comes to analyzing data?
slamgirl [31]
External criticism is very important when it comes to analyzing data, because as a researcher it is possible to get too "close" to the data, in that one can stop being objective and start looking for ways to match the data to the desired results. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZ HELP ASAP
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

The person who discovered the lost mine was Padre Phillipe La Rue and the mine was abandoned because Franciscans sent a search party to find Padre Phillipe La Rue because he wasn't reporting back to Franciscans. When Padre Phillipe La Rue saw the search party looking for him he abandoned the mine because he thought the search party was going to take over his mine and take the gold from it.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What was constructed in the 1860s and connected the East and West<br> coasts of the United States?
Cerrena [4.2K]
Transcontinental Railroads, (brainliest would be awesome) :)
5 0
3 years ago
How did William penn come in possession of land in the new world
jasenka [17]

William Penn came in possession of land in the new world because the King Charles II owed William Penn's father a sum of money who was an Admiral. For the repayment of the debt, the William Penn demanded some land.

hope this helps :)

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why were bank failures common during the Depression? Many people could not pay what they owed to banks. Many people took out new
    7·2 answers
  • What are some social contributions of Asia
    8·1 answer
  • Why might the framers have included standards in the constitution that each territory must meet before it could become a state?
    6·1 answer
  • What might happen if the freedom of the press is not protected?
    13·1 answer
  • What European industries Benefited from African resources
    12·1 answer
  • Select True or False in each case using your knowledge of East, Central, and South Africa: Bantu-speaking peoples migrated from
    15·2 answers
  • What did the Native Arkansas from Mississippian traditions do?
    6·1 answer
  • Witch two political leaders belonged to a political party that sympathized with the French and inspired the French Revolution
    15·1 answer
  • Define: Selective Servce<br>​
    9·2 answers
  • What was the significance of the battle of Antietam? Militarily &amp; Politically
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!