Answer:
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
Explanation:
In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.
Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.
<span>laissez-faire capitalism</span>
A "rational" use would mean a compromise between different interest and would also take into account scientific knowledge. Therefore neither a complete ban or unconditional permission on lumbering are rational.
A correct answer is
D. National forests should be protected to make the best use of the nation's natural resources.
Answer:
mhm
Explanation:
1. 26
2. Dog, a female, first aid kit, Emergency water filter, food
3. Aye-Aye
