The Boston Massacre is one of the earliest examples of government propaganda in the United States. The event in March of 1770 was a minor skirmish between British soldiers and a group of protesters in Boston. It probably was not considered minor to the five colonists that lost their lives, but it is still hard to judge the event as a 'massacre'. The Patriots, with their agenda for more political control and even perhaps independence from England, saw an opportunity in the events of that evening.
Colonial leadership had a difficult balance to maintain, however. They did not want to arouse the energy of the wrong type of colonists: the lower classes. They feared this group almost as much as the imperial rulers. In order to target the middle to upper-class group, the Patriots focused on utilizing the Boston Massacre through a series of pamphlets and news articles. In this way, the Boston Massacre could reach a broad literate audience.
It is probable that the American drive for independence from England would have proceeded even in the absence of the Boston Massacre. The immediate aftermath of the event did cause Britain to momentarily pause and moderate its actions (as an example, British soldiers were removed from Boston). The event was not profound enough to cause Britain to completely re-evaluate its goals for its colonial empire. For this reason, the Boston Massacre was an important propaganda tool.
The Boston Massacre was an important event in the relationship between Great Britain and the colonists. For the first time, a protest led to the death of colonists. For some, this changed the dynamic of our struggle against Great Britain.
After the Boston Massacre, the colonists reestablished the committees of correspondence. These committees served the purpose of letting others throughout the colonies know about important events that were happening. The colonists were also more watchful over the British and their activities. The colonists also decided to use this event to try to gain support from the people. In reality, the killing of five people was not a massacre. However, by calling this event the Boston Massacre, the colonists were able to portray the British in a negative light. It helped bring more sympathy and support to the colonial cause. The colonists used thuis.
The British had a response to the Boston Tea Party also. The British were aware this event could have devolved into something more serious. Thus, the British ended all Townshend Act taxes except for the tax on tea. The repeal of most of the Townshend Act taxes helped .
CONTENTS<span><span>PRINT </span><span>CITE </span></span>
General George Washington’s army crossed the icy Delaware on Christmas Day 1776 and, over the course of the next 10 days, won two crucial battles of the American Revolution. In the Battle of Trenton (December 26), Washington defeated a formidable garrison of Hessian mercenaries before withdrawing. A week later he returned to Trenton to lure British forces south, then executed a daring night march to capture Princeton on January 3. The victories reasserted American control of much of New Jersey and greatly improved the morale and unity of the colonial army and militias.
The Populist party wanted the government to take over the railroads.
The Populist party mostly made up of farmers who had several grievances such as:
- railroads overcharging them to transport their goods
- the use of gold instead of silver to back the U.S. dollar
- high charges on telegraph
In order to address these, they formed the Populist party where they called on the U.S. government to take over the railroads and telegraph wires so that the government would give them better rates.
In conclusion, the Populist party wanted more government interference so that they would be able to access the railroad and telegraph at cheaper rates.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14451855.</em>
Correct answer choice is:
A. The revolution in Russia
Red scare was widespread fear, according to which it was thought that immigrants especially from Russia, southern Europe, and eastern Europe, might intend to overthrow the United States government.
Answer:
Here is what is different in this map compared to today.
- Austria-Hungary exists.
- Germany is larger.
- Germany has some land now controlled by France.
- Romania is smaller.
- Russia is larger.
- Ireland is not yet independent from the UK.
- Poland, Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Moldova, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Finland aren't there.
- Spain controls a large part of Morocco.
- Turkey is controlled by the Ottoman Empire.
I think I got everything, hope this helps!
