Answer:
The correct answer is - option c. Compounds A and B act synergistically.
Explanation:
In the case of two compounds act together and produce or exert a pronounced effect or expression known as the synergistic action of the compounds. If they act separately the effect would be less in comparison to working together.
In the given question, when both compounds act separately they produce less ATP that is 10 and 30 respectively whereas when act together they produce 100 which suggests that Compounds A and B act synergistically.
Researchers studying about ancient groups would look at their culture, traditional economy and irrigation methods used by the farmers.
It is suggested that attitudes and behaviors about race and gender begin in "grade school".
Educators and associates are likewise sources of finding out about gender. Educators show curricular materials that contain sexual orientation stereotypic conduct, and associates display sex stereotypic states of mind and conduct. Youngsters disguise sexual orientation generalizations and biases, which thus manage their own inclinations and practices.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer:
They wanted a unanimous vote.
Explanation:
It was to include all the other colonies too
