<u>Answer:
</u>
The practice of the South Korean car manufacturer demonstrates the globalization of production.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- It is evident from the action of the car manufacturer that he is concerned with keeping the cars manufactured by him affordable for all.
- In order to secure that feat, he devises where can he fetch parts for the car at the cheapest rates.
- He chooses to go beyond his domestic boundaries to fetch the parts which can be deemed as an act resembling the globalization of his business.
Answer:
1. Children develop increasingly larger and more sophisticated vocabularies as they grow older.
Explanation:
In the 1960,Noam Chomsky proposed the LAD concept which explained a child's natural ability to learn and produce language, a component of the nativist theory of language which supports this instinctual capacity. These theories were based on supporting evidence of human inheritance of language predisposition.
The above answer does not support theorists claim however, that all human beings possess an inherited predisposition to learn language.
Answer:
C.) Import oriented nation must switch to concentrate on domestication.
Explanation:
- We are taking china as a developing country that is taking benefits from globalization.
- China is the only country that is progressing itself at the level of a European country.
- The progression of these countries has been taken step by step from geographical zone to the economic zones and progressing by implanting new industries.
- To attract foreign direct investment in their country.
- This country has the ultimate ends of the ends meet not for just opening up or just protection.
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
