All categories

3 years ago

Consider the table representing an exponential function .

Mathematics

2 answers:

SIZIF [17.4K]3 years ago

8 0

correct answer is 8 and 0.5

Pachacha [2.7K]3 years ago

6 0

I'm pretty sure it's (+1, -8)

You might be interested in

mark is working at a restaurant . bread is delivered to the restaurant every third day.meat is delivered to the restaurant every

Natasha2012 [34]

In 15 days both items will be delivered on the same day.

6 0

3 years ago

Solve the equation. 43.6 = n + 17.5

expeople1 [14]

Answer:

26.1 = n

Step-by-step explanation:

43.6 = n + 17.5

Subtract 17.5 from each side

43.6-17.5 = n + 17.5-17.5

26.1 = n

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In what time will Rs. 6400 amount to Rs. 7152 at the rate of 6% p.a?

allochka39001 [22]

Amount of Interest=7152-6400=752=I

Principal=6400=P
Rate of interest=6%=R
Time=T=?

We know

$\boxed{\sf I=\dfrac{PRT}{100}}$

$\\ \sf\longmapsto T=\dfrac{PR}{100I}$

$\\ \sf\longmapsto T=\dfrac{6400(6)}{100(752)}$

$\\ \sf\longmapsto T=\dfrac{38400}{75200}$

$\\ \sf\longmapsto T\approx 0.5year$

$\\ \sf\longmapsto T\approx 6months$

4 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP BEFORE 11:00!

serg [7]

You haven't given any definition of what T and N are in relation to the trapezoid (nor really identified which points are which on the trapezoid, though we can infer some of this from step c). So we can't provide a justification for most of these steps.

(c) is presumably because they're the parallel sides of the trapezoid.
For (d) I can only think that T, R and I are on the same line, in which case the angles TRG and TIA are congruent because RG and IA are parallel, so they are corresponding angles.
For (h), I assume by vertical you mean opposite (it's also called vertically opposite). Vertical angles are always congruent. You just said they're vertical, so this follows.

For (i), from (f) and (h) we have that corresponding angles are congruent, so the triangles must be similar. From (a) we have that GR = GA, so the triangles are congruent by AAS.

For (j), we could infer this from (i). However step (i) isn't strictly necessary; we can derive (j) directly from (f) and (h) - indeed this was the first part of the proof of (i).

7 0

3 years ago

Rita's company reimburses her expenses on food, lodging, and conveyance during business trips. The company pays $55 a day for fo

MArishka [77]

"The company pays $55 a day for food and lodging and $0.45 for each mile traveled" means that if she travels m miles and is on a trip for x days then Rita will receive:

55x + 0.45m dollars.

Rita drove 300 miles, means that m=300. Thus 55x + 0.45m becomes 

 $55x+0.45m=55x+0.45 \cdot 300=55x+135$ (dollars.)

She was reimbursed $2,335 means that $55x+135=2,335$ .

Part A: $55x+135=2,335$ .

Part B:

We are given the equation 55x+135=2,335. Subtracting 135 from both sides we have:

55x=2,335-135=2,200.

Dividing both sides by 55, we get: x=2,200/55=40.

Part C: since x represents the number of days Rita spend on this trip, and x=40, then Rita spent 40 days on this trip.

5 0

4 years ago