Answer: The new confidence index is 0.7143
Explanation: Consumer confidence index which is known as the confidence index is an index used for estimating the economy of the U.S, it is published by the conference board which shows the decree of excitement in peoples's activities on their savings and spendings.
To calculate the new confidence index;
STEP1: Add the bond increase to the current bond;
6% + 1% = 7%
4% + 1% = 5%
STEP 2: FIND THE NEW CONFIDENCE INDEX
5% ÷ 7% = 0.7143
The old confidence index can also be calculated as
4% ÷ 6% = 0.6667
Answer:
D. expropriation.
Explanation:
Oilers, Inc. refines and markets its energy products in different nations around the world. In addition, Oilers' stockholders and managers come from many different nations. If some of the nations where it operates decided to take over the assets of the company, this act would constitute an <u>expropriation.</u>
Expropriation: It is an act of government for taking private property against the will of the owner for the benefit of the overall public by building roads, highways, flyovers, airports, etc. The owner is just compensated as per government policy. This is an act of getting Expropriated. In legal terms, it is an exercise of eminent domain power.
Answer:
Accounts
Wages Expense
Wages Payable
$100,000
$100,000
Explanation:
As the expense is accrued but not paid at the end of 2013. The transaction requires an adjusting entry. This will charge a wages expense and create the wages payable liability. Ultimately on January 3 it will be paid. Wages for the two weeks are $100,000 and the 14 days has been passed for the pay period until year end of 2013.
Answer:
the three of them could be held personally liable:
- I. John
- II. John's manager
- III. The CEO, who in this specific case we assume could have prevented the crime.
Explanation:
John committed forgery and possibly fraud by forging clients' signatures on documents held by the company. His boss ordered him to do so, so he is also responsible for John's actions. John can even try to put all the blame on his boss alleging that he was forced to forge the signatures. The CEO of the firm is also responsible because the forged documents had to serve someone's illegal purposes, and the CEO probably was the one that needed them or knew about what was going on and didn't do anything to stop it.
The answer is the company is most likely facing a psychological barrier. If she's afraid to buy a product because she feels her friends will tease her if they find out, then that has to do with her mindset, which is a <span>psychological barrier for the company.</span>
