Answer:
We see that Prog A will give an annual CF of 75%*$6000 = $4500
Prog B will give annual CF of 95%*$6000 = $5700
Disc Rate Kd = 20%
So PV of Annuity of $1 for 5 yrs with Kd = 20% is 2.9906
So NPV of Prog A = CF0+CF1+ ....+Cf5 = -12000+2.9906*4500 = $1,458
So NPV of Prog B= CF0+CF1+ ....+Cf5 = -20000+2.9906*5700 = $(2,954)
So Prog A is more effective as it gives a Positive NPV
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": can be used to compute a stock price at any point in time.
Explanation:
The Gordon Growth Model, also known as the Constant Dividend Growth Model, is used to measure the value of the stock at any point in time based on the projected future dividends of the stock. Investors and analysts are commonly used to compare the estimated value of the stock against the current market price. Analysts interpret the gap between the two prices as proof that the stock could be under or overvalued by the market.
Answer:
The net present value of the machine is $5530
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Cost of the equipment = $84,000
Annual after-tax net income from the equipment after deducting depreciation = $3,000
Depreciation = $28,000
Useful life = 3 years
Required return on investment = 9% = 0.09
Now,
After-tax cash flow = After-tax net income + Depreciation
= $3,000 + $28,000
= $31,000
Therefore,
Net Present Value = Present value of cash flow - Investment
= ( $31,000 × PVIFA(11%, 3)
) - $84,000
= ( $31,000 × 2.5313 ) - $84,000
= $78470.3 - $84,000
= -$5529.7 ≈ - $5530
hence,
The net present value of the machine is $5530
The constant in a system is the control.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Kelvin buys more donuts at $0.80 per donut than at $0.95 per donut, other things equal.
Explanation:
The demand law states that if the price of a good or service decreases, the quantity demanded for that good or service will increase. On the other hand, if the price of a god or service increases, the quantity demanded will decrease. The price-quantity demanded of the demand law is inversely proportional, <em>ceteris paribus</em>.
Thus, Kelvin's case is an example of the demand law since he purchases more donuts when the price is lower ($0.80) and purchases fewer donuts when the price is higher ($0.95).
