After she worked out the problem, she had a discrepancy (disagreement) of
about 45% between her estimate and the quotient.
That's a lot ! There's almost definitely a major mistake somewhere, and
there really isn't any way to tell whether the mistake is in the estimate or
in the quotient.
My answer to the question is that Lilly has to go all the way back to the
beginning, and do the whole thing again. Only this time, she has a harder
job to do: She not only has to make another estimate and work out the
division problem again. This time, she also has to find the mistake that
she made the first time ... and there may be more than one of them.
Answer:
g(4)=f(2)
Step-by-step explanation:
f(2)=3(2)-1
f(2)=6-1
f(2)=5
We then get:
g(x)=f(2)
subsitute 5 for f(2)
g(x)=5
now solve
5=2x-3
add 3
8=2x
divide 2
4=x
so the answer is x=4 or
g(4)=f(2)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:I need the same answer lol
<span>For a parallelogram to be proven to be a rectange, the opposide sides must be parallel and the two adjacent sides must be perpendicular.
For two parallel sides, the slope of the two sides is equal.
Thus, for the parallelogram to be a rectangle, AB is parallel to CD.
The slope of AB = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1) while the slope of CD = (y4 - y3)/(x4 - x3)
Also, BC is perpedicular to CD.
For two perpendicular sides, the product of the slopes is -1.
The slope of BC is given by (y3 - y2)/(x3 - x2).
Therefore, for the parallelogram to be a rectangle.
(y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1) = (y4 - y3)/(x4 - x3) and (y4 - y3)/(x4 - x3) x (y3 - y2)/(x3 - x2) = -1.
The third option is the correct answer.</span>
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
The reason why is if it’s in the middle you always go for the highest.