Answer: Gambler's fallacy
Explanations: Gambler's fallacy can be simply defined as a phenomenon where the outcome of an event is viewed as less or more likely due to the outcome of previous events even though each event is independent.
For example, If a family should give birth to (5) five boys, gambler's fallacy will argue that the chance or probability of the family giving birth to girl next higher because the previous ones were boys, but in reality the chances are thesame because both gender has equally chance of being conceived.
So Miranda’s statement is a good example of gambler's fallacy because she argue that the probability that she will toss a tail in her sixth toss is higher than 50% and in reality, the probability of tossing a head or a tail are both thesame i.e 50%.
Answer:
Decomposers
Explanation:
Ususally fungi eats off of other things dying
During the Industrial Revolution, inaction on behalf of the government to pass labor laws and protect the workers resulted in the formation of labor unions is a true statement. This was because there had been a history of worker exploitation, with laborers receiving extremely low wages, long working hours and unhealthy work conditions. People decided to take matters into their own hands, as the government was not helping.
The correct answer is known as "extinction".
Extinction is seen in both operantly adapted and traditionally molded conduct. At the point when operant conduct that has been already fortified never again delivers strengthening outcomes the conduct progressively quits happening. likewise it can be characterized as the vanishing of a formerly learned conduct when the conduct isn't strengthened
