1. F(3)= -2(3)-5
-6-5
F(3)=-11
2. F(3)= -2(3)^2-4
-6^2-4
36-4
F(3)=32
3. F(x)=−2x−5
For: x=−2, f(x) is:f(−2)=(−2×−2)−5=4−5=−1
For: x=−1, f(x) is:f(−1)=(−2×−1)−5=2−5=−3
For: x=1, f(x) is:f(1)=(−2×1)−5=−2−5=−7
For: x=2, f(x) is:f(2)=(−2×2)−5=−4−5=−9
The Range is:
{−1,−3,−7,−9}
4. -80, -110
Answer:
The answer is "They are similar".
Step-by-step explanation:
They were comparable in this respect because both aspect ratios of the top triangle are one square more. The top triangle is equal to the base triangles if you remove one square away from the height and width.
Otherwise, we can say that it forms all different. The dilation factor which translates that bottom left point of shape I to form II is 2. But this does not map the other shape I vertices onto form II. There's, therefore, no dilation in form I of maps on form II.
Answer:
c.) in the correct answer
I'll do the first 2 and 6, and I challenge you to do the other three on your own!
For 1, from some guess and check we can figure out that 5*5=25. Since 5 is a prime number, that's it!
For 2, we can figure out that 7*7=49 and 7 is a prime number, so we're good there.
From 6, we can do some guess and check to figure out that 2*24=48, 2*12=24, 2*6=12, and 2*3=6, resulting in 2*2*2*2*3=48 since 2 and 3 are prime numbers. We found out, for example, to find 2*12 due to that if 2*24=48, 2*24 is our current factorization. By finding 2*12=24, we can switch it to 2*2*12
