1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sedaia [141]
3 years ago
12

2. How would you characterize President Obama's foreign policy? How does it compare to the foreign policy of the George W. Bush

administration?
History
1 answer:
frez [133]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Obama's foreign policy was a bit more conciliatory toward certain countries than that of his predecessor, however, Obama also intervened militarily in other countries like his predecessor did in the past.

For example, Obama sought peace agreements with Iran and Afghanistan, while Bush was much more aggressive against these countries.

But Obama also intervened with the American military in Libya and Syria, two countries that were civil wars that have not ended yet.

Another thing to highlight is that Obama tried to normalize relations with Cuba, while Bush was much more aggresive against the Island.

You might be interested in
Why does Odysseus leave the Circes island
Goryan [66]
<span>When his men finally persuade him to continue the voyage homeward, Odysseus asks Circe for the way back to Ithaca. She replies he must sail to Hades, the realm of the dead, to speak with the spirit of Tiresias, a blind prophet who will tell him how to get home.

Btw LOVE this book
</span>
8 0
2 years ago
Libya's primary economic influence was those in control of the type of economy for the country. In two to three sentences, compa
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

The economy of Libya depends primarily on revenues from the petroleum sector, which represents over 95% of export earnings and 60% of GDP. These oil revenues and a small population have given Libya one of the highest nominal per capita GDP in Africa.. After 2000, Libya recorded favourable growth rates with an estimated 10.6% growth of GDP in 2010. This development was interrupted by the Libyan ...

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Why do French doctors dislike dr. Mesmer​
Anestetic [448]
Mesmer tricked his patients into believing fake treatments
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the Emergency Bank Act?
AleksAgata [21]

Answer:  c

Explanation:   It closed banks down, allowed the government to look closely at them and open them up if they were fiscally sound.

7 0
3 years ago
During the early 20th century, many Western thinkers and political philosophers defended the principles of universalism and equa
Leto [7]

Answer:

The "CIVILIZING MISSION" argument

Explanation:

Colonialism is a practice of domination, which involves the subjugation of one people to another. One of the difficulties in defining colonialism is that it is hard to distinguish it from imperialism. Frequently the two concepts are treated as synonyms. Like colonialism, imperialism also involves political and economic control over a dependent territory. The etymology of the two terms, however, provides some clues about how they differ. The term colony comes from the Latin word colonus, meaning farmer. This root reminds us that the practice of colonialism usually involved the transfer of population to a new territory, where the arrivals lived as permanent settlers while maintaining political allegiance to their country of origin. Imperialism, on the other hand, comes from the Latin term imperium, meaning to command. Thus, the term imperialism draws attention to the way that one country exercises power over another, whether through settlement, sovereignty, or indirect mechanisms of control.

The legitimacy of colonialism has been a longstanding concern for political and moral philosophers in the Western tradition. At least since the Crusades and the conquest of the Americas, political theorists have struggled with the difficulty of reconciling ideas about justice and natural law with the practice of European sovereignty over non-Western peoples. In the nineteenth century, the tension between liberal thought and colonial practice became particularly acute, as dominion of Europe over the rest of the world reached its zenith. Ironically, in the same period when most political philosophers began to defend the principles of universalism and equality, the same individuals still defended the legitimacy of colonialism and imperialism. One way of reconciling those apparently opposed principles was the argument known as the “civilizing mission,” which suggested that a temporary period of political dependence or tutelage was necessary in order for “uncivilized” societies to advance to the point where they were capable of sustaining liberal institutions and self-government.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This platform fears that the American governors in the Philippines want to get rid of "the spirit of 1776" in the islands. What
    12·1 answer
  • The cradle of civilization was in central Europe.<br><br> true or false
    8·1 answer
  • The second industrial revolution brought enormous changes to many cities in the late 1800s. Explain what the term second industr
    8·1 answer
  • The Code of Hammurabi is a product of this civilization. Mesopotamian Indus Mycenaean Minoan
    12·2 answers
  • Which of these causes Americans to move to the West in the mid-1800s
    13·1 answer
  • George Beatty ______________________
    12·1 answer
  • What were the effects of european migration on africa?
    12·1 answer
  • The photograph shows a building destroyed by an earthquake in Mexico City in 1985. The Mexican people blamed scenes such as this
    13·2 answers
  • What do people in the Basque region of Spain hope to achieve?
    7·1 answer
  • How many wings does a serafin have ​
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!