Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is 'Incremental cost allocation method' that ranks the individual users of a cost object in order of users most responsible for a common cost (the most responsible will be primary user) and then uses these rankings to allocate the costs among the users (incremental users).
Stand-alone cost allocation method allocates cost proportionately among all users based on a basis which relates to each users proportion of the total. For example the basis could be proportion of sales of responsibility centers to total sales of organization.
Hence the statement is false.
I think it’s D I don’t know if I’m wrong or right but D sounds right
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, this concept is an example of supply and demand. When there is a limited supply of a product like the soft drinks in the vending machines then the price would match the number of people that want to buy the product. If in a very hot day more people want to buy a soft drink to cool down then the supply will begin to decrease as more people buy, this will create an increase in price as people would be ok with paying more money in order to be one of the lucky few to get one of the few soft drinks that are left.
Answer:
$0.875
Explanation:
The computation of the stock price that changes upon the announcement is shown below:
As it given that
The corporate tax is 35%
So there is an effective disadvantage i.e. retention
Also, the stock price would be decline by 35% of cash
i.e.
= 35% × $250 million ÷ 100 million outstanding
= $0.875
Hence, the stock price is $0.875
Answer:
Yes, other countries probably have a comparative advantage in the production of rice.
Explanation:
Comparative advantages are given by the opportunity costs of producing one product instead of another. In this case, the opportunity cost of producing rice in China has increased due to higher prices of fruits and vegetables.
The costs of producing a certain good are not only labor costs, but they also include capital and land costs. It is possible that other Asian countries have lower labor costs than China and therefore have comparative advantage in the production of rice. But even countries were labor is more expensive can also have a comparative advantage in the product of rice due to lower capital and/or land costs.