Answer:
A) total debt = $2,230,000 and it represents 175,000 - 125,000 = 50,000 outstanding shares
price per share = $2,230,000 / 50,000 = $44.60 per share
B) enterprise value = 175,000 x $44.60 = $7,805,000
According to M&M proposition I, the enterprise value is the same with or without any outstanding debt. So the company's value is the same for both alternatives.
Answer:
$570,000
Explanation:
At the time of recording of the fixed assets, the fixed assets should be reported at purchase cost or historical price or originally cost or acquiring cost, whether all other values are given i.e appraisal value, the seller purchased value, similar warehouse book value, etc
So, in the given case, it would be recorded at $570,000 as the buyer purchase the building at this cost only.
Answer:
The Macro Environment consists of 6 different forces. These are: Demographic, Economic, Political, Ecological, Socio-Cultural, and Technological forces. This can easily be remembered: the DESTEP model, also called DEPEST model, helps to consider the different factors of the Macro Environment.
Explanation:
Answer:
$770,000
Explanation:
Purchase = Ending inventory +Cost of goods sold- Beginning inventory Purchased
= $240,000+$800,000-$180,000= $860,000
Cash paid to suppliers = Beginning AP+ Purchased -Ending AP Cash Payments
= $150,000+$860,000-$240,000 =
$770,000
Therefore the amount that Jenny Gardner should report as cash payments to suppliers is $770,000
Answer:
NO, court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the landscaper's contract claim
Explanation:
given data
landscape work = $30,000
seeking in damages = $100,000
solution
landscaper assert and maintain claim against an home owner for breach of contract is no because court have diversity of an citizenship in the jurisdiction over an home owner for negligence claims .
we know that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure permit only counter claims and federal court have not any subject matter jurisdiction over an landscaper contract claims
