Answer:
A promise to deliver a deed
Explanation:
The term, 'strict performance' is used to describe a contract between two parties. A contract is an agreement between two parties, and it is legally binding. When discharging contracts involving services, 'substantial performance' is required. For example, if I tell a painter to paint my house blue except for the kitchen and storeroom which should be painted white, and he does accordingly but failed in painting the kitchen white, he has performed substantially even though there was a minor breach. The consequences of which would be borne by him.
'Strict performance' is required in contracts where the terms are stated in express terms and the standards are very high. A 'deed' is such a contract because it is a document specifying the legal rights of a person or the ownership of a property. It requires the signatures of the two parties. Therefore, strict performance and adherence to the contractual deed are required.
An example of blockbusting is causing panic selling by telling people that value in a neighborhood will decline due to the purchase of homes by minorities.
<h3>What is
blockbusting?</h3>
blockbusting can be regarded as the act of profiteering through inducing property owners to sell hastily which do occur at a loss by appeals to fears of depressed values.
In this case, An example of blockbusting is causing panic selling by telling people that value in a neighborhood will decline due to the purchase of homes by minorities.
Learn more about blockbusting on:
brainly.com/question/24452126
#SPJ1
Answer:
loanable amount after Fed operation = $950 M
Securities after fed operation = $50 M
attached below is the T-account table
Explanation:
Given data:
For assets : securities = $100 M , Loans = $800 M
For Liabilities : Constant demand deposit = $1000 M
difference between the assets and liability = $100 M and this makes the Banking system unbalanced hence the Banking system needs the intervention of the Fed. and the reduction in the required reserve ratio from 10% to 5% is the right action
How with the reserve ratio reduced to: 0.05
hence required Minimum required securities after operation = 0.05 * 1000 M = 50 M
Note : Total demand deposits = securities + loanable amount
therefore loanable amount after Fed operation = $1000 M - $50 M = $950
Attached below is the T-table
When both tables are compared it can be seen that there is a significant increase in the loanable amount after the Fed's operations and increase in Loanable amount transcends to increase in Monetary base
He proposed the theory of the structure of atoms
(1)The nucleus at the centre of the atom has the positive charge.Most of the mass of the atom is concentrated in the nucleus.
(2)The negatively charged electrons revolve around the nucleus in specific orbits
(3)In comparison with the size of the atom , the nucleus is very very small.
Answer:
It is a violation of NASD rules against guaranteeing a customer against loss.
Explanation:
In this case the RR is guaranteeing the customer against loss. The customer initially bought the shares for $20 the new price is $10. The RR now coming in to buy the shares above market value is a way to guarantee the customer against loss, and its a NASD violation.
