Answer:
a. Increased creativity
Explanation:
When properly managed diversity is beneficial to companies.
The highest score is the best option upon concluding the multi-criteria analysis .
<h3>What is a multi-criteria analysis' benefit?</h3>
By evaluating the results, performance, implications, and trade-offs of various policy alternatives, a Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) can be used to discover and contrast them. MCA offers a methodical method for supporting complicated decisions in accordance with predetermined standards and goals.
<h3>What is a multi-criteria analysis' benefit?</h3>
Managers can make environmental management decisions that involve trade-offs between a variety of intended management action outcomes with the aid of multi-criteria analysis. Transparent decision modeling begins with clearly specified criteria and hierarchically arranged objectives (particularly when employing qualitative measures).
To know more about multi-criteria analysis visit:
brainly.com/question/14863437
#SPJ4
<span>Cash equivalents, the investments securities that are for short-term investing, and they have high credit quality and are highly liquid. Cash equivalents, also known as "cash and equivalents," are one of the three main asset classes, along with stocks and bonds. Cash equivalents also serve as one of the most important health indicators of a company's financial system.</span>
Answer and Explanation:
A. Given that Design 1A will cost $1.7 million to build and $175,000 per year to maintain
Given that Design 1B will cost $3.6 million to build and $40,000 per year to maintain
Both designs are assumed to be permanent
To find ROR using AW based rate of return equation, we find present value of each design and equate them:
Each design is permanent so
Present value of perpetuity:
Design 1A= 1700000+175000/r
Design 1B = 3600000+40000/r
=1700000+175000/r=3600000+40000/r
135000/r=1900000
Cross multiply
r=135000/1900000
r= 0.0710
r=7.10%
B Given that ROR=7.10% and MARR is 25%
MARR>ROR
Hence we reject both designs
