L = w+22
2(l+w) = 4040
2(w+22+w) = 4040
2w + 22 = 4040/2 = 2020
2w = 2020-22 = 1998
w = 999ft
l = w+22 = 999+22 = 1021ft
w = 999 ft
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
-7k = -45.5
Explanation:
You can solve this by plugging in the “k” to the problems that are listed.
If you were to plug 6.5 in for all those problems, you’d get:
-3(6.5) = -19.5
-1 + 6.5 = 5.5
-7(6.5) = -45.5
-2 + 6.5 = 4.5
So, in this case, looking at the ones I answered and looking at the problems listed, the correct answer would have to be -7k = -45.5.
24/5 = (20 + 4)/5 = 20/5 + 4/5 = 4 + 4/5
= 4 4/5
Answer:
a) 5:3
b) 7.5:5.3
Step-by-step explanation:
150min : 90min (1 and a half hour)
10 : 6
5 : 3
150 × 10 mm : 1060 mm
1500 : 1060
750 : 530
7.5 : 5.3
