1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lakkis [162]
2 years ago
10

As the Chief Financial Officer for a metal refinery, Kaylee disagrees with using a turnkey strategy to enter into the Asian mark

et. She is concerned that the company will not benefit from a long-term interest and could lose financially if the market proves to be successful. What is one way the metal refinery could get around this concern
Business
1 answer:
denpristay [2]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Take a minority equity interest in the operation.

Explanation:

Multiple Choice

a) Sell competitive advantage to competitors.

b) Agree to import another product from the Asian market.

c) Take a minority equity interest in the operation.

d) Withhold vital process technology from the local firm.

e) Establish a franchise operation.

A turnkey strategy is a market entry position where the project is built from the ground up and turned over to the client ready to go – turn the key and the plant is operational. This is a very good way to enter foreign markets as the client is normally a government. While when one takes a minority equity interest they do not have the votes to control the operations and finances of the the company’s business.

Kaylee, the Chief Financial Officer for a metal refinery, Kaylee reasons that the company doesn't have longterm interest in the Asian market advises to take a minority equity interest in the operation in order not to lose financially.

You might be interested in
Assume a company's current ratio and acid-test ratio are less than 1.0 before it purchases inventory on credit. When it makes th
I am Lyosha [343]

Answer: b. Its quick ratio decreases.

Explanation:

The Quick ratio is calculated net of inventory to determine if a company can cover its current liabilities with its more liquid current assets. The formula is to subtract Inventory from the Current Assets and then divided that by the Currency liabilities.

The Quick ratio will be less than before because the number of current assets will not change but the amount of current liabilities will change as the goods were purchased on credit. With a larger denominator, the resultant ratio will be less than before.

7 0
3 years ago
During the year,Liptom Company made an entry to write off a $4,000 uncollectible account. Before this entry was made, the balanc
Andru [333]

Answer:

$55,500

Explanation:

The computation of the net realizable value after the write off entry is show below:

The credit balance in allowance with terms to bad debts is

= $4,500 - $4,000

= $500

Now the net realizable value is

= ($60,000 - $4,000) - ($4,500 - $4,000)

= $56,000 - $500

= $55,500

Hence, the same is to be considered

7 0
2 years ago
The Computer Store had the following revenue and expenses during the month ended July 31. Fees for computer repairs $ 41,600 Adv
RideAnS [48]

Answer:

Net profit= $21200

Explanation:

Giving the following information we need to calculate the net profit or loss:

Revenues:

Fees for computer repairs $ 41,600

Fees for printer repairs 5,950

Total revenues= 47550

Expenses: (-)

Advertising expense 5,700

Salaries expense 18,500

Telephone expense 850

Utilities expense 1,300

Total expense= 26350 (-)

Net profit= 21200

8 0
3 years ago
Why is it important to study the ‘post- purchase evaluation'?
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

Research shows that customers often find a gap in their expectations versus what the company actually delivers as an experience. Creating positive post purchase customer experience is a great way for companies to build a relationship with their customers, and build engagement and loyalty for their products and brand.

3 0
3 years ago
A sample of 15 consumers provided the following product ratings for three different products. Five consumers were randomly assig
tia_tia [17]
  1. The value of the test statistic is equal to 9.98.
  2. There's sufficient statistical evidence at a 5% level of significance to state that there's a significant difference among the ratings for the products A, B, and C.

<h3>What is Kruskal-Wallis test?</h3>

The Kruskal-Wallis test is also referred to as one-way ANOVA on ranks or Kruskal-Wallis H test and it can be defined as a rank-based nonparametric test that is typically used to determine whether or not there are statistically significant differences between two (2) or more samples of an independent variable on either a continuous or ordinal dependent variable.

This ultimately implies that, a Kruskal-Wallis test can be used to determine whether two (2) or more samples originate from the same distribution.

Based on the given sample, the hypothesis is given by:

  • H₀: Ratings are the same for all the three products.
  • Ha: There are differences among the ratings for the products.

For this exercise, we would use R-studio to perform the Kruskal-Wallis test as follows:

df₁ = read.table (header = TRUE, text ="

product   Ratings

    A           55

    A           64

    A           79

    A           41

    A           69

    B           85

    B           99

    B           91

    B           88

    B           95

    C           65

    C           49

    C           35

    C           51

    C           58

")

DF₁ kruskal.test(Ratings ~ product, data = df1)

Based on the Kruskal-Wallis test, we obtained the following results (outputs):

Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 9.98.

Degrees of freedom, DF = 2.

P-value = 0.006806.

Next, we would determine the test statistic as follows:

Test statistic = Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 9.98.

P-value = 0.007.

Therefore, the p-value (0.007) is less than α = 0.05. Based on this, we should reject the null hypothesis (H₀) and accept the alternate hypothesis (Ha).

In conclusion, we can infer and logically deduce that there's sufficient statistical evidence at a 5% level of significance to state that there's a significant difference among the ratings for the products A, B, and C.

Read more on null hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/14913351

#SPJ1

7 0
8 months ago
Other questions:
  • Use the following for the next five questions: The following data is given for the Walker Company: Budgeted production..........
    12·1 answer
  • Brite plating company has lost a number of valuable employees to competitors. it recently gave employees a substantial raise, bu
    9·1 answer
  • In order for the hitch ball to be secured properly, what should be the last part assembled?
    6·1 answer
  • You are looking to buy a car. You can afford $440 in monthly payments for four years. In addition to the loan, you can make a $1
    14·1 answer
  • Leh Inc. recently borrowed $275,000 from its bank at a simple interest rate of 9 percent. The loan is for nine months and, accor
    9·1 answer
  • Two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. The government has decided to reduce the pollution a
    7·1 answer
  • Jake wants to purchase a new computer and go to the Caribbean for spring break. The computer is priced at $1,299, and the vacati
    14·1 answer
  • Elaborate on the meaning of lobbying and networking​
    7·1 answer
  • Kelsay Corporation has provided the following contribution format income statement. Assume that the following information is wit
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following would not be reported as current liabilities on the balance sheet?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!