According to the strong form of efficient market hypothesis, private information is of no help in earning abnormally high returns.
<h3>What is an efficient market hypothesis?</h3>
It should be noted that an efficient market hypothesis simply means that assets reflect the information that are available.
In this case, according to the strong form of efficient market hypothesis, private information is of no help in earning abnormally high returns.
Learn more about efficient market hypothesis on:
brainly.com/question/14311423
#SPJ1
Answer:
D. Networking ensures higher-paying jobs.
Explanation:
Networking is the act of interacting and sharing information between a group of people with common interests in various settings, such as the work environment, schools, and other social gatherings. When students attend the same school, they share common interests and goals. Networking among them would pave way for possible help in the future with regards to finding a job. But it would be wrong to assume that networking would be a guarantee for higher-paying jobs.
Networking would also help graduates from college to interact with people who have progressed farther in their career than they have. So, they can learn from their wealth of experience.
Answer:
B.) It helps insure your possessions are distributed appropriately.
Explanation:
All of the other answers are false.
Hope this helps! If you have any additional questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or your teacher to be sure you master the subject. Stay safe, and please mark brainliest! :)
Answer:
"Stop-loss order" is the right answer.
Explanation:
According to the question,
Purchase price,
= $50
Current selling price,
= $80
Current gains,
= $30
- Investors begin to give their earnings if somehow the market capitalization begins to fall beneath $80. In advance to minimize this, we need to set a purchase requisition of $80 for stop-loss.
- So whenever the market decreases beyond $80, with us investments are traded, and thereby the existing profits of $30 have been safeguarded.
Thus, the above is the correct explanation.
