It suggest that any living abject has DNA. Even if the organ is not living it still consist of DNA because it doesn’t disappear after it dies
its b i took the quiz and got it right
<span>Open-mindedness does interfere with scientific progress as it can lead to acceptance of untested ideas. Open-mindedness can lead to actually accepting results that are not true. This is not a great angle for people involved with scientific experiments. Open-mindedness should be limited to the fact that the results can lead to negative answers. People that can accept this theory will ultimately succeed in their strive for creating something new. There is nothing wrong in discarding the results that does not seem to fit the bill.
Hope I helped!:)</span>
The first step of the light
reactions, (photons)
strikes the chlorophyll in (photosystem II)
Scientists change the names of taxonomic groups to match the current nomenclature is probably NOT a reason for these changes.
Scientists change the names of taxonomic groups to match current nomenclature.
<u>Explanation:</u>
There are various main reasons why taxonomists from time to time require or choose, to modify the name of an organism such as a plant. Initially, the naming of plants is treated by a set of laws ( the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature ) which sets out how to accurately name plants and how to solve cases where two or more names have been used for one species.
It seldom happens that applying the rules requires us to change a name. For example, if a species named by one botanist turns out to have been before legitimately named by an elder botanist.
