The PICTA came into force as of 2003 when 6 member countries of the Forum of the Pacific Helases signed and ratified the pact in their different governments. The main objective of PICTA is free trade among the 14 nations that make up the Forum.
In 2006, the PACIFIC AGREEMENT ON THE RELEVANCE OF ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS comes into effect, this agreement allows to celebrate free trade agreements between the member countries and an external state, with the following reservation: only Australia and New Zealand will be able to deal directly with external states. The rest of the member countries can only sign a treaty, after consulting Australia and New Zealand. The agreement in general allows all the products produced in the member countries to have the same value and to be sold relatively easily abroad.
Answer:
At times, trade embargoes work because they can <u>contribute to more peace and stability</u>, and they can even prevent the debilitation of human rights violations, terrorism, aggression and nuclear threat. However, long term restrictions can be quite damaging and aggravate poverty and the standard of living for civilians.
Explanation:
if wrong pls forgive me pls
mark me brainliest pls
Answer: It had a History of Protecting Slavery and Segregation – This is often cited as one of the main detriments of the system of federalism that we have in this country, that since slavery was a state issue, it was something that could not be removed on the national level.
It Allows for Inequalities Between Different States – For example, instead of education funding throughout the country being the same, since it is a state issue, some states will spend more, per capita, on education than other states, causing what could be considered a disparity. The same goes for other things, as well, such as taxes, health care programs, and welfare programs.
The Blockage of Nationalist Policies by States – States can fight against the existence of certain national laws by challenging them in court, or going out of their way to not enforce those national laws, or even deliberately obstructing enforcement of national laws.
Racing to the Bottom – One argument given is that states will compete with each other in an oppositional way, by reducing the amount of benefits they give to welfare recipients compared to, say, a neighboring state, motivating the undesirables to go to the neighboring state, thereby reducing their welfare costs even more. This reduction of state benefits to needy has been deemed the ‘race to the bottom.’
I think the boy should be 9 years old because he know about the surface area and height
