<span>C. flappers listening to jazz and doing the Charleston</span>
Answer:
Yes he may prevail
Explanation:
He wants to exercise his civic duty and he has every right to file a suit because he has been taxes indirectly to the city.
Firstly, The farmer does not pay any tax directly to the city because a portion of his farm property is turned over by the county to the city to support the city police department, which indirectly, he is paying tax because this support to the city is categorized indirectly as his tax.
Secondly, His farm property has been vandalized several times over the months and the police didn't do anything about it to improve his situation which calls for attention to why nothing has been done about it despite his support to the city police department.
With the two above paragraphs, he has a point and his also lives in one of the rural communities and the city ordinance provides that only residents of the city may vote, but the city ordinance is always the city ordinance, the law might and might not favor him, he could get payment for the damages on his properties, but it would be quite difficult for him to prevail over the suit because he doesn't live in the city
Answer:
Manslaughter
Explanation:
The two types of criminal murder are murder and manslaughter. However, the latter, while unlawful, it does not involve malice or an intention to kill or even seriously harm the person. Manslaughter does not also involve any reckless disregard for the life of the individual and hence always involves no malice aforethought. They can be labelled as excusable or justifiable homicides, but the moral blame for manslaughter is less than that of first or second degree murder.
