Answer:
the just-world hypothesis
Explanation:
When misfortunes befall a person, others sometimes think the victim of circumstances deserved what happened. One reason put forth to explain why someone would think like that has been called <u>the just-world hypothesis</u>.
The just-world hypothesis is the idea that people need to believe one will get what one deserves so strongly that they will rationalize an inexplicable injustice by naming things the victim might have done to deserve it.
Answer:
The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves "Federalists." Their adopted name implied a commitment to a loose, decentralized system of government. ... In many respects "federalism" — which implies a strong central government — was the opposite of the proposed plan that they supported.
Explanation:
The answer is: American troops could invade Iraq if necessary.
Answer:
It talks about federalism in the constitution at article 1 section 8
Explanation: