<span> Judith Miller was a reporter for the New York
Times who wrote an article claiming that Iraq has nukes. The government used
Miller’s article to justify going to “war” (not really a war when it’s just one
side killing another). She claimed that Iraq is going to use the nuclear
weapons to hurt the American people, which made people, and rightfully so, fear
for their safety. After the US started the war (and got all the oil they
needed), they revealed that Iraq had no nuclear weapons, after all. The reporter, Judith Miller was put in jail
for a short while afterwards for not revealing her sources when she published the article; today, she is blamed by many people
to be part of the cause of the Iraq war.</span>
<span>
</span>
<span> People are continuously suggesting that the US finally leaves Iraq today, however that has not yet happened. A lot of people are in favor of the US leaving Iraq because enough is enough and the war going on there hasn't been doing anyone any good. The US has been losing a lot of money on the military spending and there has been a lot of loss of life on the Iraqi side, so it's not benefiting any side. Other people that oppose the US leaving Iraq mostly do it privately because they want to continue stealing Iraqi oil or because they genuinely believe that Iraq is still a threat. </span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Whenever countries have different opportunity costs in production they can benefit from specialization and trade. Benefits of specialization include greater economic efficiency, consumer benefits, and opportunities for growth for competitive sectors.
From the <em>functionalist</em> perspective, people form groups to meet instrumental and expressive needs
Answer:
The correct answer is The needs that motivate the media use.
Explanation:
The Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT) aims to understand the motivations of people to seek out the media and explore the needs that they are trying to fulfill while doing it. It assumes that individuals have power over media usage and not the other way around.
The main objective of the theory is to unveil and understand the needs that media usage fulfills in individuals.
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
