1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sveta_85 [38]
3 years ago
12

In triangles ABC,which side is adjacent to angle C but opposite to angle B

Mathematics
1 answer:
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]3 years ago
4 0
Side AC. AC is next to <C and across from <B
You might be interested in
Simplify  ( √ 5 ) ( 3 √ 5 )
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

5^\frac{5}{6}

Step-by-step explanation:

\sqrt{5} can be represented as 5^{\frac{1}{2}} and \sqrt[3]5} can be represented as 5^{\frac{1}{3}}. Therefore, the expression can be rewritten as:

5^{\frac{1}{2}}*5^{\frac{1}{3}}

The rule for multiplying two exponents with the same base is you add the exponents. For example: x^m*x^k=x^{m+k}

We can use the same property to get:

5^{\frac{1}{2} +\frac{1}{3}}

which is just 5^\frac{5}{6} after you add the fractions

8 0
3 years ago
Together teammates pedro and ricky got 2685 base hits last season. Pedro had 277 more than ricky. How many hits did each player
Ksju [112]
Let x be the number of base hits Ricky got. With this representation, the number of base hits Pedro got is x + 277. The sum of their number of hits is equal to 2685. The equation that best represent the scenario is,
                                   x + x + 277 = 2685
The value of x is 1204. Therefore, Ricky got 1204 and Pedro got 1481. 
3 0
3 years ago
Katie is buying a refrigerator for her apartment. She's choosing between a regular fridge and a gigantic fridge . She notices th
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

Volume of the gigantic fridge is 2.5 times the volume of regular fridge.

Step-by-step explanation:

This question is incomplete; here is the complete question.

Katie is buying a refrigerator for her apartment. She's choosing between a regular fridge and a gigantic fridge (details are shown in the table below). She notices that the gigantic fridge costs 3 times as much as the regular fridge.

How many times as great is the volume of the gigantic fridge as the volume of the regular fridge?  

Area of the base, Height, Price

Regular Fridge: 1m² / 2m / $200

Large Fridge: 2m² / \frac{5}{2}m / $600

In this question cost of the large fridge is 3 times as much as the regular fridge.

Area of the base of regular fridge = 1m²

Height of the regular fridge = 2m

So volume of this fridge = 1×2 = 2m³

Area of the base of the large fridge = 2m²

Height of the large fridge = \frac{5}{2}m

Volume of the large fridge = \frac{5\times 2}{2} = 5m³

Ratio of the volumes of the large and regular fridge = \frac{5}{2}=2.5:1

Therefore, volume of the gigantic fridge is 2.5 times the volume of regular fridge.

3 0
3 years ago
The least-squares regression model y =−3.4+5.2x and correlation coefficient r=−0.66 were calculated for a set of bivariate data
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}  

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:

m=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}

Where:

S_{xy}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)}{n}

S_{xx}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^2_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2}{n}

\bar x= \frac{\sum x_i}{n}

\bar y= \frac{\sum y_i}{n}

And we can find the intercept using this:

b=\bar y -m \bar x

And the model obtained for this case is:

y = -3.4 +5.2 x

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:  

r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}  

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

8 0
3 years ago
Evaluate 81.4 % of 58.81 km Give your answer rounded to 2 DP.
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

47.87

.................

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need help with slopes
    7·1 answer
  • Graph the linear equation and answer each of the following questions. y=-2x-3 (A)What is the y-intercept?
    12·1 answer
  • Simplify the expression. w - .25w
    5·1 answer
  • 15 Points!<br><br> Find f(x) and g(x) so that the function can be described as y = f(g(x)).
    11·1 answer
  • Kira looked through online census information to determine the average number of people living in the homes in her city. What is
    8·2 answers
  • Solve the following system of equation <br><br><br> X-2y=14<br> X+3y=9
    7·2 answers
  • Rewrite 3 x 6/8 as the product of a unit fraction and a whole number
    10·1 answer
  • Help Me Please (40 Points) + Brainliset Answer
    10·2 answers
  • Area of the bounded curves y=x^2, y=√(7+x)
    7·1 answer
  • Which inequality is represented by the graph below? Check all that apply. A number line going from 4 to 14. An open circle is at
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!