Minor criminal offense, specifically a strict liability offense. Strict liability refers to an offense made regardless of the the intent of action. In other words, even if you have no malicious intent, you are still liable for the offense. Another example is possession of drugs.
This is an illegal question. You may ask about a person's convictions for drug related charges, but you should not ask about treatment. This could also be classified as a needless question, but mostly illegal.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
The industry supply curve will be the supply curve given multiplied by the total number of firms. This will be:
P = 50 + 0.1Q
Check: since Q = 100
P = 50 + 10/100Q
P = 50 + 0.1Q
To get the Equilibrium price and quantity, we've to equate the market demand curve and supply. This will be:
Market demand = P = 200 - 0.9Q
Market Supply = P = 50 + 0.1Q
Therefore,
200 - 0.9Q = 50 + 0.1Q
200 - 50 = 0.1Q + 0.9Q
150 = Q
Equilibrium quantity = 150 units
Since P = 50 + 0.1Q
P = 50 + 0.1(150)
P = 50 + 15
P = 65
Equilibrium price is 65.
The units of output that will be produced by a firm operating in this market with a marginal cost function, MC = 130Q will be 2.
Answer:
Yes Gordon can sue Floors n' Mores for the settlement of the contract keeping in mind that Gordon has made partial completion of the contract. Full payment would be determined based on the completion of the total work in line withe the plans submitted when the contract was signed
Explanation:
In order to understand the scenario in case if Gordon wants to sue Floors n Mores they can only be compensated for the amount of project completion in line to the expectations that matches to Floors n More.
For Example if 75% of the work is in line with the expectation of Floors N More then Gordon should be paid total amount payable multiply by 75%.
Usually in such cases if the contract is fulfilled to certain extent it is preferred to close the contract based on the %age of completion because major reconstruction, buying of fixtures and furniture was executed. Hence major risks and rewards were transferred to Floors n Mores.
Answer:
A) $200,000 loss recognized by Jean and a basis in the land of $200,000 to Billie
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
For loss recognized, the amount would be
= Land basis - fair value of land
= $400,000 - $200,000
= $200,000
And, the basis in the land should be equal to the fair value of the land i.e $200,000
Hence, the correct option is A
By dividing the fair value from the land basis we can get the loss recognized
