1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zimovet [89]
3 years ago
10

Briefly summarize the facts of the Dred Scott case and discuss the impact that the decision had on the growing conflict between

North and South in the Antebellum period.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Viktor [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

"In April 1846, Dred and Harriet filed separate lawsuits for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court against Irene Emerson based on two Missouri statutes. One statute allowed any person of any color to sue for wrongful enslavement. The other stated that any person taken to a free territory automatically became free and could not be re-enslaved upon returning to a slave state.

Neither Dred nor Harriet Scott could read or write, and needed both logistical and financial support to plead their case. They received it from their church, abolitionists and an unlikely source, the Blow family who had once owned them.  

Since Dred and Harriet Scott had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory — both free domains — they hoped they had a persuasive case. When they went to trial on June 30, 1847, however, the court ruled against them on a technicality and the judge granted a retrial.

The Scott’s went to trial again in January 1850 and won their freedom. Irene appealed the case to the Missouri Supreme Court which combined Dred and Harriet’s cases and reversed the lower court’s decision in 1852, making Dred Scott and his family slaves again.  

In November 1853, Scott filed a federal lawsuit with the United States Circuit Court for the District of Missouri. By this time, Irene had transferred Scott and his family to her brother, John Sanford (although it was determined later that she retained ownership). On May 15, 1854, the federal court heard Dred Scott v. Sanford and ruled against Scott, holding him and his family in slavery.  

In December 1854, Scott appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court. The trial began on February 11, 1856. By this time, the case had gained notoriety and Scott received support from many abolitionists, including powerful politicians and high-profile attorneys. But on March 6, 1857, in the infamous Dred Scott decision, Scott lost his fight for freedom again...... By the time the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its Dred Scott decision, Irene had married her second husband, Calvin Chaffee, a U.S. congressman and abolitionist. Upset upon learning his wife still owned the most infamous slave of the time, he sold Scott and his family to Taylor Blow, the son of Peter Blow, Scott’s original owner.  

Taylor freed Scott and his family on May 26, 1857. Scott found work as a porter in a St. Louis hotel, but didn’t live long as a free man. At about 59 years of age, Scott died from tuberculosis on September 17, 1858."

Explanation:

Source: https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/dred-scott-case

You might be interested in
Forestry and Mining are examples of __________.
ladessa [460]

Answer:

c. industries in the West based on available natural resources

Explanation:

The West have sizable quantities of ore and forests, and are used when available and needed. However, this is not too say that rely solely on these two for their economy, but is still a part of it.

~

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can you rewrite the run ons as two complete sentences
arsen [322]
Queen Elizabeth 1 knighted Raleigh. He was appointed captain of the Queens guard and later set sail on an unsuccessful search of El Dorado, the legendary city of gold.
8 0
3 years ago
Davis is the manager of a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility in a developing country. The manufacturing unit does not meet th
Julli [10]

Answer:

ethical dilemma

Explanation:

According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Davis is facing an ethical dilemma. This refers to a problem in which there may or may not be a morally correct choice, and if there is then that choice may not be the most logically correct choice. Which is what Davis is facing, since he can choose the logical choice which would be to demand a better manufacturing unit, but by doing so it will cause a raise in the prices of necessary pharmaceuticals that people will not be able to afford, which would be morally wrong.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

5 0
2 years ago
What things are needed for human solidarity to thrive? in a catholic perspective? ​
g100num [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The things that are needed for human solidarity to thrive in a Catholic perspective are the understanding and the compassion of good Catholics to the pain and suffering of other people.

According to the Catholic religious teachings, Catholics must recognize the necessities of other people who are suffering and show the kind of compassion and respect for the events they are living, understanding that God has a purpose for every one of us.

The reasons of the almighty God can be unknown to humans, but he has his motives. Or as the common saying states, "God acts in strange ways."

Catholics are taught that humans form a big community on Earth, and they can help and be part of the solution trying to understand the circumstances of other people, walk in their shows for a while to understand what they are living, to never judge, and lend a helping hand when it is needed.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these statements about people with obsessive-compulsive disorder is false? they might think about harming somebody they
Paladinen [302]
Which of these statements about people with obsessive-compulsive disorder is false? they are unaware that their obsessions are irrational and counterproductive. Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a type of anxiety disorder. If you have OCD, you will have repeated and distressing thoughts called obsessions. You may do the same thing over and over again to try to make the thoughts disappear. These repeated actions are called compulsions.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did Benedict Arnold betray his country
    14·1 answer
  • What major natural boundary held the northernmost border of the Roman Empire during its decline?
    11·1 answer
  • Examples of racial discrimination
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following represents a defining characteristic of an empire?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did Hitler want to kill the Jewish people?
    13·2 answers
  • The police department of a small city has jurisdiction within the city limits and over a defined portion of the surrounding rura
    13·1 answer
  • High-achieving students typically have parents who ____
    10·2 answers
  • Which approach did Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. not use to gain equality and civil rights for all citizens?
    13·1 answer
  • How can taking personal responsibility at home and at
    7·1 answer
  • Centuries ago, countries sponsored explorers to set sail for parts unknown and return with tales of new lands. These exploration
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!