1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zimovet [89]
3 years ago
10

Briefly summarize the facts of the Dred Scott case and discuss the impact that the decision had on the growing conflict between

North and South in the Antebellum period.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Viktor [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

"In April 1846, Dred and Harriet filed separate lawsuits for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court against Irene Emerson based on two Missouri statutes. One statute allowed any person of any color to sue for wrongful enslavement. The other stated that any person taken to a free territory automatically became free and could not be re-enslaved upon returning to a slave state.

Neither Dred nor Harriet Scott could read or write, and needed both logistical and financial support to plead their case. They received it from their church, abolitionists and an unlikely source, the Blow family who had once owned them.  

Since Dred and Harriet Scott had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory — both free domains — they hoped they had a persuasive case. When they went to trial on June 30, 1847, however, the court ruled against them on a technicality and the judge granted a retrial.

The Scott’s went to trial again in January 1850 and won their freedom. Irene appealed the case to the Missouri Supreme Court which combined Dred and Harriet’s cases and reversed the lower court’s decision in 1852, making Dred Scott and his family slaves again.  

In November 1853, Scott filed a federal lawsuit with the United States Circuit Court for the District of Missouri. By this time, Irene had transferred Scott and his family to her brother, John Sanford (although it was determined later that she retained ownership). On May 15, 1854, the federal court heard Dred Scott v. Sanford and ruled against Scott, holding him and his family in slavery.  

In December 1854, Scott appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court. The trial began on February 11, 1856. By this time, the case had gained notoriety and Scott received support from many abolitionists, including powerful politicians and high-profile attorneys. But on March 6, 1857, in the infamous Dred Scott decision, Scott lost his fight for freedom again...... By the time the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its Dred Scott decision, Irene had married her second husband, Calvin Chaffee, a U.S. congressman and abolitionist. Upset upon learning his wife still owned the most infamous slave of the time, he sold Scott and his family to Taylor Blow, the son of Peter Blow, Scott’s original owner.  

Taylor freed Scott and his family on May 26, 1857. Scott found work as a porter in a St. Louis hotel, but didn’t live long as a free man. At about 59 years of age, Scott died from tuberculosis on September 17, 1858."

Explanation:

Source: https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/dred-scott-case

You might be interested in
Please help very ez, will brainly, 5 star and thanks
Natalija [7]

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the ideals of popular sovereignty, social contract, natural rights, and individual rights?
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

<u>Popular sovereignty</u>

Is the ideals which state that a society need to be run according to the will of the majority of the people rather than a small number of elites.

<u>Social contract</u>

An ideal which state that a society can only be run if the people and the government engaged in a social contract. The people agree to let themselves constricted under the control of government legislations. In return, the government must work to increase the well being of the people.

<u>Natural rights</u>

Natural rights are a set of universal rights that cannot be undone / violated by any legislations or government actions under any circumstances.

<u>Individual rights</u>

Individual rights are a set of rights that bestowed to the people through a specific legal system. This rights can come and go depending on who held the position within the government.

3 0
3 years ago
How do religious events of the past, impact the events of today?
klemol [59]

Answer:

it varies a lot from those days

6 0
3 years ago
True or false? barbiturates appear to act on specific receptor sites, but benzodiazepines do not.
Masja [62]
The <span>answer is, False!</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Which constitution al amendment outlawed slavery in the United States?
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

Emancipation Proclamation

Explanation:

There you go.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Arlo is offered a job in Des Moines, where the CPI is 60, and a job in New York, where the CPI is 125. Arlo's job offer in Des M
    10·1 answer
  • Potential test questions should not be part of a study guide because they will always be reviewed in your study group.
    5·2 answers
  • Jelaskan cara menetapkan tujuan penulisan​
    15·1 answer
  • What detail from Sinclair's book is the most disgusting to you?
    9·2 answers
  • Is "The unfound animails" a good title for a greek mythology thing?<br> Just want ur oponion -w-
    13·1 answer
  • Who was the first president to make thanksgiving a national holiday?
    12·2 answers
  • In erevelles and minear, crenshaw argues that social movements about single identity politics have
    15·1 answer
  • People can reduce the number of conflicts in which they are involved if they learn how to identify the causes of conflict. Pleas
    14·2 answers
  • Merit pay is an attempt to make pay contingent upon __________. years of experience in the industry tenure in the organization s
    7·1 answer
  • Why was the haitian revolution successful
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!