C
A change in the way votes are recounted.
High blood pressure and heart rate.
That's just how life just is :3 hope this helps :3
Answer:
faced with discrimination
Explanation:
According to my research on the studies conducted by Blumstein and Schwartz, I can say that based on the information provided within the question they were faced with discrimination. This is because same-sex couple believed this was an insult and that they face real discrimination and hate while heterosexual couple never had these problems.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
<em>False.</em> It is an inductive, weak argument.
Explanation:
The given statement is not deductive and valid, <em>because it derives its conclusion only from limited evidence</em> that U.N. is presented in a negative light in this isolated statement.
<u>The other example</u>, is a survey of students meal choice preferences in the campus canteen. Only because 75% of students in a sample group of 100 said that they do not support availability meat-based meals in the canteen, does not mean that 75% of all students do not support availability meat-based meals as well.