The last leader of the soviet union was Mikhail Gorbachev.
Federalists: thought the Articles were excessively frail, feel that exclusive a solid national government can beat the challenges of the Republic confronts, freedoms that could be incorporated into a Bill of Rights are shrouded in the State Constitutions
Anti-Federalists: think there ought to be a Bill of Rights, the national government would be given excessively influence, the states would never again have the ability to print cash
<h2>
Answer:</h2><h2>
<em><u>The</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>right</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Migration</u></em><em><u>.</u></em></h2>
<em><u>Migration</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>root</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>of</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>spreading</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>languages</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
The idea of getting a new language is intermixing two already spoke languages to get a new language
Though both sides received benefits, however, the north seemed to gain the most. It seemed so because the major victory for the south was the Fugitive Slave Law. In the end, the north refused to enforce it. By extension, it shows that the north seemed powerful.
<h3>What is better deal in the Compromise of 1850?</h3>
As part of the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington, D.C., was abolished. Furthermore, California entered the Union as a free state and a territorial government was created in Utah.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about the Compromise of 1850: brainly.com/question/8165267
#SPJ1
It has a much higher population and land mass