Answer: Williamson industries would have obtained $7.78 billion in sales
Explanation: According to the question, the company is having a total of $2 billion in fixed assets. The fixed assets are currently operating at 90% (0.9) of its total capacity. At his level, the company is able to achieve a sales figure of $7 billion. The implication is as follows;
Fixed assets (at 100%) = 2 billion
Fixed assets (at 90%) = 2 * 0.9
Fixed assets (at 90%) = 1.8
If the company utilizes $1.8 billion to achieve a $7 billion sales figure, then operating at full capacity (100%) would yield the following;
7/x = 90/100
(Where x equals sales level at 100% capacity)
7/x = 0.9
Cross multiply
x = 7/0.9
x = 7.7777...
x ≈ 7.78
Therefore, if Williamson Industries had been operating at full capacity, it would have obtained a sales level of $7.78 billion
Answer:
9.69%
Explanation:
Given the following :
Net income = $4819
Total asset = $38,200
Taxable income = $6,100
Dividend payout ratio = 30% = 0.3
The internal growth rate is calculated thus ;
(Return on asset × Retention ratio)/[1-(Return on asset × Retention ratio)]
Return on asset = (Net income / total asset)
Return on asset = ($4,819 / $38,200)
Return on asset = 0.12615
Retention ratio = 1 - Dividend payout ratio
Retention ratio = 1 - 0.3 = 0.7
Hence internal growth rate :
(0.12615 × 0.7) / 1 - (0.12615 × 0.7)
0.088305 / 1 - 0.088305
0.088305 / 0.911695
= 0.0968580
= 0.0968580 × 100%
= 9.685%
= 9.69% ( 2 decimal places)
Answer:
C: A road map.
Explanation:
Business plans are mapped out just like road map. Pinball machines and dreams are not mapped out and wish lists are just collections of things that you want while a business plan is a plan of action.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
-9.92%
Explanation:
P₀ = Div₁ / (Re - g)
- Div₁ = next year's expected dividend = $1.12 x (1 - 11.5%) = $0.9912
- Re = cost of equity = ?
- P₀ = current stock price = $62.91
- g = dividend's growth rate = -11.5%
Re = (Div₁ / P₀) + g
Re = ($0.9912 / $62.91) - 11.5%
Re = 1.58% - 11.5% = -9.92%
Since the cost of equity or required rate of return cannot be negative, I suppose that investors are not worried about Abbott distributing dividends, instead, they prefer that the company reinvests earnings in new projects.
