The actions that Susan made are clearly an irruption to someone’s privacy. With that said, basically, Susan is a person whose abilities allow her to meddle into someone’s business without their permission. This is what people usually call as “privacy violation” since the person who is stealing someone’s information is doing it without them to know.
Hacking is a very common activity nowadays. There are some apps and tools that facilitate this kind of task,s for hackers. Sometimes they have their own hacking software but it is pretty common to do it throughout programming.
The problem with this kind of activities is that it is a moral dilemma since it is a cybernetic felony that send people to jail and sometimes they also have to pay a bail in order to not to go to prison if they are discovered and caught. In the worst scenery, people that commit this type of crimes, are both convicted and forced to pay the bail.
Most of the time, people or enterprises are hacked because their system is very vulnerable so that makes it really easy to hack. This is one of the reasons for the new type of security that is being implemented in people’s computers in order to avoid this type of misfortunes that currently affect many people around the world.
To summarize, Susan’s occupation can be described as a chain of risky activities that she has to do in order to avoid being discovered by the person she attacked; so that, she always must be very careful to not let any trace behind her actions.
Answer:
1. Emotional paradox.
Explanation:
The paradox of the emotions refers to the disconnect, when we study emotions they appear self-evident and apparent and in objective scientific terms, they were exceedingly difficult to define. An individual think they know about an emotion when they see it, and because of it conclude that emotions are distinct phenomenons that can be detected with some degree of accuracy, but scientists still need to create a clear parameters to determine the presence of emotions.
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
Polytheistic beliefs practices existed before rise of Islam in the 7th century
I hope that helped you
The incans flourished from 1200 to 1535, until they were conquered by the Spanish conquistadors.
